INSTITUTE OF THE MANDATORY LEGAL REPRESENTATION ACCORDING TO THE REFORM OF PROCEDURAL LAW: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
https://doi.org/ 10.17803/2311-5998.2017.31.3.153-156
Abstract
This article discusses the feasibility of the reception advocate’s monopoly institute in the Russian procedural law. The author analyzes the foreign experience in regulating the relevant legal mechanisms, which served as the basis for such implementation in the Russian civil process. The study concludes that there is insufficient reason to consolidate the institute of compulsory legal representation in the domestic legislation.
References
1. Елисеев Н. Г. Гражданское процессуальное право зарубежных стран : учебник. - 2-е изд. - М. : ТК Велби, Проспект, 2004.
2. Елисеев Н. Г. Конструктивная критика Концепции единого Гражданского процессуального кодекса на основе динамической теории права // Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. - 2015. - № 8.
Review
For citations:
Arestov V.V. INSTITUTE OF THE MANDATORY LEGAL REPRESENTATION ACCORDING TO THE REFORM OF PROCEDURAL LAW: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2017;(3):153-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/ 10.17803/2311-5998.2017.31.3.153-156
Views:
208
Email this article 
