Access Relations to Copyright Objects Expressed in the Digital Environment
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.121.9.098-106
Abstract
This article is devoted to the analysis of changes in relations arising in the sphere of use of copyright objects expressed in digital assets. The legal systems of various countries were unable to choose the most suitable models for the legal regulation of the circulation of works objectified in the form of program code. The problem was that copyright objects, objectified in digital form and called “digital content,” could not be unambiguously qualified, and were recognized as goods, services, or the provision of data. The European legislator spoke in favor of applying a sui generis legal regime to digital content. Thus, classical objects of copyright, acquiring a digital form of fixation and expression, begin to participate in civil circulation using fundamentally different legal mechanisms than the mechanisms of licensing agreements, namely, through the possibility of providing access to digital objects.
About the Authors
L. A. NovoselovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila A. Novoselova, Head of the Department of Financial Transactions and new technologies in law; Head of the Department of Intellectual Rights, Dr. Sci. (Law), Full Professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
O. A. Polezhaev
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Polezhaev, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Transactions and new technologies in law; Lecturer of the Department of Intellectual Rights Department, Cand. Sci. (Law)
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Кузнецов Ю. В. Криптоактивы как документарные ценные бумаги // Закон. — 2018. — № 9.
2. Birgit Clark. Blockchain and IP Law: A Match made in Crypto Heaven? — 2018. — URL: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2018/01/article_0005.html (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
3. Helberger N., Loos M. B. M., Lucie Guibault, Chantal Mak & Lodewijk Pessers. Digital Content Contracts for Consumers // Journal of Consumer Policy. — 2013. — P. 37—57. — URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10603-012-9201-1 (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
4. Howells G. Protecting Consumer Protection Values in the Fourth Industrial Revolution // Journal of Consumer Policy. — 2020. — P. 145—175. — URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10603-019-09430-3 (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
5. Kiviat TI Beyond bitcoin: issues in regulating blockchain transactions // Duke Law J 65. — 2015. — Р. 605—608. — URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/beyond-bitcoin%3a-issues-in-regulating-blockchain-kiviat/36fa59d37b05ef91da98c8cb6ab1541f34434f26 (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
6. Mark bide arrow — steps towards resolving the ‘orphan works problem’// Serials — 23 (1). — March 2010. — URL: http://www.editeur.org/files/collaborations/publications/serials%20 march%202010%20-%20mark%20bide%20-%20arrow%20-%20steps%20towards%20resolving%20the%20orphan%20works%20problem.pdf (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
7. Michèle Finck & Valentina Moscon. Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management 2.0 // IIC — International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. — 2019. — P. 77—108. — URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-018-00776-8/ (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
8. Schmidt-Kessel M. The application of the Consumer Rights Directive to digital content. — Brussels: DG Internal Policies, 2011. — URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201101/20110113att11670/20110113att11670en.pd (дата обращения: 01.02.2021).
Review
For citations:
Novoselova L.A., Polezhaev O.A. Access Relations to Copyright Objects Expressed in the Digital Environment. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2024;1(9):98-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.121.9.098-106