Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Participation of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Consideration by Arbitration Courts of Cases Challenging acts of Prosecutorial Response: Problems of Law Enforcement

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.118.6.173-179

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of law enforcement practice in cases related to challenging acts of prosecutorial response. The author provides information on the indicators of the application of acts of prosecutorial response, indicating the importance of these legal means of the prosecutor’s office, as well as the facts of their recognition by the courts as illegal. Based on the analysis of the results of the consideration of cases of this category by arbitration courts, the main reasons for recognizing acts of prosecutorial response as illegal are given. The article considers the question of whether or not it is necessary in each case to make an act of prosecutorial response to carry out an inspection, and to make an appropriate decision about it. The problem of determining the presence or absence of the fact of interference by the prosecutor’s office in the administrative and economic activities of a legal entity as a basis for recognizing the relevant act of prosecutorial response as illegal is raised. The author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to amend the federal legislation regulating the conduct of prosecutorial inspections, and also points out the relevance of clarifying a number of issues in the relevant resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

About the Author

M. N. Miroshnichenko

Russian Federation

Maria N. Miroshnichenko, Senior Assistant to the Moscow Interregional Transport Prosecutor for Ensuring the participation of Prosecutors in сivil and arbitration proceedings, Cand. Sci. (Law) 

22B, ul. Krasnoprudnaya, Moscow, 107140



References

1. Авагимова Ю. А. Понятие акта прокурорского реагирования через его сущность // Уголовное право и процесс. — 2017. — № 2.

2. Ергашев Е. Р., Корешникова Н. Р. Основные правовые средства прокуратуры Российской Федерации как инструмент обеспечения исполнения закона. — Екатеринбург, 2010.

3. Мирошниченко М. Н. Представительство и защита интересов органов и организаций прокуратуры Российской Федерации в судах : монография. — М., 2024.

4. Мирошниченко М. Н. Участие органов прокуратуры в рассмотрении судами дел об оспаривании актов прокурорского реагирования: проблемы правоприменения в части определения наличия вмешательства прокуратуры в хозяйственную деятельность // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. — 2003. — № 9.


Review

For citations:


Miroshnichenko M.N. Participation of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Consideration by Arbitration Courts of Cases Challenging acts of Prosecutorial Response: Problems of Law Enforcement. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2024;(6):173-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.118.6.173-179

Views: 155


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)