On the necessity to improve criminal legal counteraction to the creation and activity of dual-use biolaborations
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.116.4.151-159
Abstract
The article deals with the topic of assessing the activities of dualuse biolaboratories and improving the criminal-legal counteraction to their negative impact. The author justifies the relevance of this topic by the growing scale of illegal activities of the United States in the field of dual-use biological research and their active expansion in the territory of the states bordering the Russian Federation.
The author analyzes the general concept and characteristic features of dualuse bio-laboratories. The article emphasizes the importance of developing an effective legal framework to regulate the activities of such bio-laboratories, as well as norms establishing liability for violations committed during their establishment or organization of their activities. The article substantiates the necessity of adopting criminal-legal norms aimed at ensuring biological safety of the population and preventing the possibility of committing illegal actions when conducting biological research.
In addition, the expediency of reforming the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and making the necessary additions to the current version of Article 355 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for the effective protection of biological safety is substantiated.
About the Author
M. G. LevandovskayaRussian Federation
Maria G. Levandovskaya, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Блинов А. Г. Незаконное биомедицинское исследование и его уголовно-правовая оценка // Современное право. — 2016. — № 2. — С. 103—109.
2. Большой энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред. А. М. Прохоров. — М.: Советская энциклопедия; СПб.: Фонд «Ленингр. галерея», 2002. — 1628 с.
3. Делевер А. В. Трактовка сущности понятия биолабораторий двойного назначения в уголовном праве // Северо-Кавказский юридический вестник. — 2021. — № 3. — С. 168—174.
4. Криминализация незаконных биомедицинских экспериментов с участием человека: сравнительный контент-анализ / Ю. Н. Ермолаева, В. С. Красовский, Г. С. Хазова, О. И. Петрашова // Современные проблемы науки и образования. — 2016. — № 4.
5. Крылова Н. Е. Уголовное право и биоэтика: проблемы, дискуссии, поиск решений. — М.: Инфра-М, 2006.
6. Шакарянц С. Э. Биолаборатории США — угроза жизни всего человечества // Регион мир. — 2022. — № 5. — С. 37—44.
7. Шаргородский М. Д. Прогресс медицины и уголовное право // Избранные труды. — СПб.: Юридический центр-Пресс, 2004.
8. Beyond Spinoff. Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World / J. Alic, L. Branscomb, H. Brooks, A. Carter, G. Epstein. — Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
9. Cello J., Paul A. V., Wimmer E. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template / // Science. — 2002. — № 297 (5583).
10. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus / Т. М. Tumpey, C. F. Basler, P. V. Aguilar, H. Zeng, A. Solorzano, D. E. Swayne [et al.] // The Science. — 2005. — № 310 (5745). — Р. 77—80.
11. Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox / R. J. Jackson, A. J. Ramsay, C. D. Christensen, S. Beaton, D. F. Hall, I. A. Ramshaw // Jay Virol. — 2001. — № 75 (3).
12. Molas-Gallart J. Dual-Use Technologies and Different Mechanisms. International School on Disarmament Research on Conflicts. — Candrai, 1998.
Review
For citations:
Levandovskaya M.G. On the necessity to improve criminal legal counteraction to the creation and activity of dual-use biolaborations. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2024;(4):151-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.116.4.151-159