Actual seizure of land for state and municipal needs: legal nature and methods of protection
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.105.5.188-196
Abstract
This article considers the institution of the actual seizure of land plots for state and municipal needs, which is not provided for by legislation, but recognized by judicial practice: its legal nature and methods of protection that legal entities can use in the event of the actual seizure of land plots from them.
The article contains an analysis of individual court decisions, which made it possible to identify existing gaps in the legal regulation of relations related to the actual seizure of land for state needs. In particular, the issues concerning the ways of protecting the owner of the actually seized land plot remain not fully settled. The current legislation has not developed effective legal mechanisms to protect the rights and legitimate interests of right holders, has not formulated a unified approach to determining the equivalence and fairness of compensation provided to the right holder when withdrawing land for state needs. The solution of these issues will ensure a balance of public and private interests.
About the Author
N. M. FrolovaRussian Federation
Natalya M. Frolova, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Вербина О. Л. Спорные вопросы реализации процедуры изъятия земельных участков для государственных и муниципальных нужд // Юрист. — 2022. — № 6.
2. Григорьев М. И. Фактическое изъятие земельных участков для публичных нужд: способы защиты прав землевладельцев // Вестник Арбитражного суда Московского округа. — 2015. — № 1.
3. Пельвицкая Е. П. К вопросу об отдельных правомочиях собственника при фактическом изъятии (фактическом занятии) земельного участка для государственных и муниципальных нужд // Бизнес, менеджмент и право. — 2018. — № 2.
Review
For citations:
Frolova N.M. Actual seizure of land for state and municipal needs: legal nature and methods of protection. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;(5):188-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.105.5.188-196