Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Causal Relationship in the Criminal Law of England

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.98.10.096-109

Abstract

This article explains for the Russian reader the doctrine of causaion in the criminal law of England. As a result, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) the reduction of causation to a cause sine qua non promoted in the Russian theory of criminal law is inappropriate; 2) mens rea does not allow limiting the range of punishable acts to reasonable limits; 3) the Englih understanding of causality in criminal law is not very perfect, it is contradictory and casuistic and so it is unsuitable for reception, the interpretation of causality in many cases seems too broad; 4) a useful basis of English doctrine is the understanding that causation cannot be interpreted in a purely mechanistic context, the understanding of causation directly affects criminal policy and morality; 5) “blameworthiness” of an act seems to be a better criterion for a causation than its “danger” (as suggested by V. N. Kudryavtsev).

About the Author

I. A. Klepitsky
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Klepitsky, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Кудрявцев В. Н. Объективная сторона преступления. — М., 1960.

2. Курс советского уголовного права : в 6 т. — М., 1970. — Т. 2 / под ред. А. А. Пионтковского, П. С. Ромашкина, В. М. Чхиквадзе.

3. Курченко В. Н. Проблемы квалификации преступлений в условиях фактической ошибки // Российский судья. — 2003. — № 9.

4. Малинин В. Б. Причинная связь в уголовном праве. — СПб., 2000.

5. Соктоев З. Б. Причинность и объективная сторона преступления. — М., 2015.

6. Спиридонова Л. Э. Уголовно-правовое значение фактической ошибки в личности потерпевшего при квалификации преступлений против жизни // Криминалистъ. — 2012. — № 2 (11).

7. Трайнин А. Н. Избранные труды. — М., 2004.

8. Ashworth A. Principles of Criminal Law. — Oxford, 2009.

9. Hart H. L. A., Honore A. M. Causation in the Law. — Oxford, 1959.

10. Heaton R., De Than C. Criminal Law. — Oxford, 2011.

11. Herring J. Criminal Law. — London, 2009.

12. Moore M. S. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics. — Oxford, 2009.

13. Ormerod D. Smith and Hogan Criminal Law. — Oxford ; New York, 2008.

14. Thomas M. Criminal Law. — Saltford, 2020.

15. Witjens E. Considering causation in criminal law // The Journal of Criminal Law. — 2014. — 78 (2).


Review

For citations:


Klepitsky I.A. Causal Relationship in the Criminal Law of England. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2022;1(10):96-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.98.10.096-109

Views: 240


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)