Sociology of Criminal Law: Methods of Studying Public Opinion and their Interpretation in Criminal Law Research
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.98.10.028-036
Abstract
The article presents a special methodology of the sociology of criminal law aimed at establishing the parameters of public perception of the justice of punishments imposed by courts. It is generally believed that we are facing a crisis of excessive criminalization: our criminal law has become chaotic, unprincipled and overly expansive, while attempts to make criminal law orderly, principled and restrained are being made in almost every criminal law study, but the significance of these attempts for lawmaking today is negligible. The traditional direction of criminal policy research rests on the absence of a concept of reforming the criminal law; the latest theoretical models of such concepts were also not in demand by the legislator. It can be concluded that the main concept of modern state policy is precisely the absence of such a concept. The study of public knowledge showed that the public knows little about crime, as well as about the system of responding to it, including statistics: crime rate, recidivism rate and average sentences.
About the Author
V. N. VoroninRussian Federation
Vyacheslav N. Voronin, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Cand. Sci. (Law)
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Есаков Г. А., Долотов Р. О., Филатова М. А., Редчиц М. А., Степанов П. П., Цай К. А. Уголовная политика: дорожная карта (2017—2025 гг.) // URL: https://www.csr.ru/ru/publications/ugolovnaya-politika-dorozhnaya-karta-2017-2025-gg/.
2. Лопашенко Н. А., Кобзева Е. В., Хутов К. М., Долотов Р. О. Теоретическая модель Особенной части Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации: основные положения структуры и содержания // Всероссийский криминологический журнал. — 2017. — Т. 11. — № 1. — С. 109—118.
3. Frase R. and Roberts J. V. Paying for the Past: Prior Record Enhancements in the US Sentencing Guidelines. — New York : Oxford University Press, 2019.
4. Gómez D. V. Ciudadanos y actitudes punitivas: un studio piloto de población univarsitaria española. — 2008.
5. Herzog S., Einat T. Moral Judgment, Crime Seriousness, and the Relations Between them: an Exploratory Study. — Crime & Delinquency. — 2012. — 62. 10.1177/0011128712466889.
6. Leclerc Ch., Niang A., Duval M.-Ch. Understanding the Relationship Between Public Opinion and Experience With the Criminal Justice System // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. — 2017. — 30. 10.1093/ijpor/edx007.
7. Loader I., Sparks R. Democratic experimentalism and the futures of crime control. — 2019. — 10.4324/9780429468179-8.
8. Ryberg J. Penal Theory, Moral Intuitions, and Public Opinion // J. Ryberg and J. Roberts (ed.) Popular punishment: on the normative significance of public opinion. — New York : Oxford University Press, 2014.
9. Ryberg J., Roberts J. V., De Keijser J. More than a Single Crime. Sentencing the Multiple Count Offender. — New York : Oxford University Press, 2017.
10. Stobbs N., Mackenzie G., Gelb K. Sentencing and Public Confidence in Australia: The Dynamics and Foci of Small Group Deliberations // Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. — 2014 — 48.10.1177/0004865814537652.
Review
For citations:
Voronin V.N. Sociology of Criminal Law: Methods of Studying Public Opinion and their Interpretation in Criminal Law Research. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2022;1(10):28-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.98.10.028-036