Legal means of protecting the rights to the results of intellectual activities in healthcare in international business
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.84.8.069-076
Abstract
The author analyzes the legal means of protecting the rights to the results of intellectual activity through the TRIPS agreement and its impact on the development of international business in the field of healthcare. Attention is paid to the national patent policies of different legal orders, exploring the theoretical differences in the policies of different countries. It also addresses key domestic implementation policy issues as the new rules move from the international to the national level. Finally, it examines the implications of TRIPS for managing innovation in ICT-based industries, including pharmaceuticals, and where ICT has enabled global value chains, where the speed and distributed nature of innovation makes intellectual outcomes both less efficient and more necessary
About the Author
O. V. Sushkova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSLA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor of the Department of Information Law and Digital Technologies, Associate Professor of the Department of Business and Corporate Law, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Ершова И. В. Предпринимательское право : учебник для вузов. — М.: Юриспруденция, 2005.
2. Михайлов А. В. Проблемы становления цифровой экономики и вопросы развития предпринимательского права // Актуальные проблемы российского права. — 2018. — № 11. — С. 68—73.
3. Мохов А. А. Правовые основы обращения лекарственных средств // Предпринимательское право. Приложение «Право и Бизнес». 2017. — № 2.
4. Предпринимательское право России: итоги, тенденции и пути развития : монография / Е. Г. Афанасьева, А. В. Белицкая, В. А. Вайпан [и др.] ; отв. ред. Е. П. Губин. — М. : Юстицинформ, 2019.
5. Сушкова О. В. Гражданско-правовой режим инноваций в научно-технической сфере (на примере деятельности высших учебных заведений) : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. — М. : РПА Минюста РФ, 2010.
6. Сушкова О. В. Правовые проблемы реализации современных биотехнологий в сфере социального предпринимательства // Гражданское право. — 2019. — № 4. — С. 32—35.
7. Ali J. T., Mayes S., Haeberle H., Haeberle H. The MedTech innovation course: description and initial experiences with a novel collaborative course model // Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. — 2020. — URL: https://info.catme.org (дата обращения: 17 февраля 2020 г.).
8. Azmeh S., Foster C. & Echavarri J. The international trade regime and the quest for free digital trade // International Studies Abstract. — 2020. — № 22 (3). — Р. 671—692.
9. Maskus K. Private rights and public problems : The global economics of intellectual property in the 21st century. — Washington, DC : Peterson Institute, 2012.
10. Merges R. P. & Nelson R. R. 1990. On the complex economics of patent scope // Columbia law review. — 1990. — № 90 (4).
11. Sampa B. N. & Shadlen K. C. Indian pharmaceutical patent prosecution: The changing role of Section 3 (d) // Plos one. — 2018. — № 13 (4).
12. Sweet C. M. & Eterovic D. Do patent rights matter? 40 years of innovation, complexity and productivity // World Development. — 2019. — № 115. — Р. 78—93.
13. Taubman A. & Watal J. Revisiting the TRIPS negotiations: Genesis and structure of this book // J. Watal & A. Taubman (eds). The making of the TRIPS agreement: Personal insights from the Uruguay round negotiations: 3—14. — Geneva : WTO, 2015.
Review
For citations:
Sushkova O.V. Legal means of protecting the rights to the results of intellectual activities in healthcare in international business. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2021;1(8):69-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.84.8.069-076
Views:
331
Email this article 
