Legal consciousness as the basis of legal research in the digitalization era
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.145-152
Abstract
The article studies trends in the development of law understanding in the context of digitalization. Based on a postclassical methodology, the article investigates the main structural elements of law understanding as a philosophical and legal category: the subject of law understanding, the object of law understanding, the content of law understanding. It is concluded that in the context of digitalization, these elements have changed significantly, both in meaning and in terms of their role in legal research. However, the transformation of law understanding is due not only to digitalization, but also to a change in the worldview paradigms of domestic legal science in the post-soviet period. Strengthening the conventionality of law and jurisprudence leads to a shift in legal research from the reconstruction of law reality to its deconstruction. Law understanding not only retains, but also expands its significance as a methodological basis of law research of theoretical and sectoral orientation.
About the Author
A. V. SkorobogatovRussian Federation
Professor, Department of theory of state and law and public legal disciplines, Dr. Sci. (History), Associate Professor
42, ul. Moskovskaya, Kazan, Russia, 420111
References
1. Боруленков Ю. П. Правовое мышление как интеллектуальная составляющая
2. юридического познания // Правоведение. — 2017. — № 2 (331). — С. 6—41.
3. Ершов В. В. Анализ интегративного правопонимания с общенаучных позиций // Российское правосудие. — 2017. — № 5 (133). — С. 6—18.
4. Максимов С. И. Концепция правовой реальности // Постклассическая онтология права / под общ. ред. И. Л. Честнова. — СПб. : Алетейя, 2018. — С. 46—50.
5. Першин А. Н. Цифровые права лиц, осуществляющих предварительное расследование // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2021. — № 2. — С. 108—115.
6. Скоробогатов А. В., Краснов А. В. Правовая реальность России: понятие и структура // История государства и права. — 2017. — № 7. — С. 54—58.
7. Стовба А. В. Об особенностях философско-правовой методологии // Правоведение. — 2017. — № 4. — С. 88—101.
8. Харт Г. Философия и язык права. — М. : Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация», 2017. — 384 с.
9. Giltrow J. The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. — Berlin ; Boston : De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. — XI. — 373 p.
10. Goldman D. B. Globalisation and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring Patterns of Law and Authority. — New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007. — XIV. — 362 p.
11. Minda G. Postmodern legal movements: law and jurisprudence at century’s end. — New York : New York University Press, 1995. — 362 p.
12. Sheldon P., Rauschnabel Ph. A., Honeycutt J. M. The Dark Side of Social Media: Psychological, Managerial, and Societal Perspectives. — London : Academic Press, 2019. — 200 p.
Review
For citations:
Skorobogatov A.V. Legal consciousness as the basis of legal research in the digitalization era. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2021;(5):145-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.145-152