Integrated information systems of the US criminal justice
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.74.10.158-166
Abstract
The article analyzes the existing information systems of criminal justice in the United States both at the federal and state levels. The features of the functioning of the federal systems of criminal justice are noted. An assessment of the activities of state information systems is given, the features of the work of some of them are given. The criteria are highlighted that made it possible to carry out a comparative legal analysis of state information systems. Close attention is paid to the activities of electronic systems of bodies carrying out preliminary investigation in the United States. The author’s classification of complex information systems of the US criminal justice is proposed.
About the Author
A. A. Sobenin
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law, Cand. Sci. (Law),
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9
References
1. Курс уголовного процесса / А. А. Арутюнян, Л. В. Брусницын, О. Л. Васильев [и др.] ; под ред. Л. В. Головко. — М. : Статут, 2016.
2. Пастухов П. С. Электронный документооборот в уголовном процессе США // Правопорядок: история, теория, практика. — 2018. — № 4 (19).
3. Broderick Jr., Hon John T. The Changing Face of Justice in a New Century: The Challenges It Poses to State Courts and Court Management. — 2010.
4. Broderick Jr., Hon John T. The Changing Face of Justice in a New Century: The Challenges It Poses to State Courts and Court Management. — 2011.
5. Caradonna P. New Hampshire E-Court Project: e-court issues and choices. — Part 2. — 2017.
6. Clarke Th. M., Jannet Lewis, Di Graski. Best Practices in Court Privacy Policy Formulation. — 2017.
7. Hekim H., Gul S. K., Akcam B. K. Police use of information technologies in criminal investigations // European Scientific Journal. — 2013.
8. Investigative Uses of Technology: Devices, Tools, and Techniques. — Washington, DC: U. S. — Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. — 2007.
9. Eck J. E., Rossmo D. K. The new detective: Rethinking criminal investigations // Criminology & Public Policy. — 2019.
10. Performance Measures Evaluation for the Utah Drug Court. — 2017.
11. Webster L. P. Technology: The NCSC Court IT Governance Model. — 2006. 12. Wessels B., Harry Leverette. Data Quality Management for Courts. — March 2009.
Review
For citations:
Sobenin A.A. Integrated information systems of the US criminal justice. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2020;(10):158-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.74.10.158-166
Views:
267
Email this article 
