Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

The Practice Problems of Appointing Forensic Examinations in the Civilian Process and Ways to Overcome Them

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2026.140.4.167-174

Abstract

The paper examines the problems of legal support for forensic expertise in civil law proceedings. A comparison is made between the scope of legal regulation and current clarifications of the norms of law on judicial practice, set out in the acts of the highest court, in relation to different forms of legal proceedings. Based on a comparison with the criminal process, the conclusion is drawn about the incompleteness and objective obsolescence of the resolutions of the Plenums of the highest judicial instances on arbitration and civil proceedings. Among the most significant changes in recent years, which are proposed to be taken into account in the current recommendations to the courts, are the appearance of a list of types of forensic examinations conducted exclusively by state forensic expert institutions, as well as a change in the payment procedure for forensic examinations in civil proceedings. It is concluded that the conceptual and regulatory proximity of approaches to the institute of forensic examination makes it possible to combine civil processes with a common list of issues that should be taken into account in the development of resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation at the present stage. A version of the relevant range of issues is proposed.

About the Author

A. S. Chistilina
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Anastasia S. CHISTILINA, Assistant of the Forensic Expertise’s Department, Cand. Sci. (Law)

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Дьяконова О. Г. Получение образцов и проб для сравнительного исследования как процессуальное действие // Вестник Волгоградской академии МВД России. — 2015. — № 4 (35). — С. 100—107.

2. Елагина Е. В. О некоторых вопросах подготовки и назначения судебных экспертиз в свете постановления Пленума Верховного Суда РФ «О судебной экспертизе по уголовным делам» // КриминалистЪ. — 2012. — № 1 (10). — С. 78—82.

3. Мыскина К. М. О некоторых проблемах оплаты судебных экспертиз в гражданском процессе // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2024. — № 3. — С. 137—143.

4. Россинская Е. Р. О правовом статусе судебного эксперта // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 7 (47). — С. 15—24


Review

For citations:


Chistilina A.S. The Practice Problems of Appointing Forensic Examinations in the Civilian Process and Ways to Overcome Them. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2026;(4):167-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2026.140.4.167-174

Views: 108

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)