The Contribution of Uncitral to the Regulation of Electronic Commerce
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.136.12.174-181
Abstract
Purpose: the study aims to analyze the international legal regulation of electronic commerce and to identify the role of UNCITRAL in shaping unified legal mechanisms that ensure the reliability, legal certainty, and technological interoperability of digital trade processes. Methodology: the research was carried out using a legal-dogmatic approach, complemented by theoretical analysis. Conclusions: the rapid development of electronic commerce requires moving away from the universal application of traditional law toward the adoption of specialized international instruments that provide functional equivalence, technological neutrality, and crossborder recognition of electronic documents. It is demonstrated that the absence of unified technical and legal standards leads to market fragmentation and reduces trust in electronic records, whereas UNCITRAL model laws establish a basis for overcoming these issues. Scientific and practical significance: the results of the study can be applied in law-making, the activities of international organizations, the development of national legislation, as well as in educational programs related to international trade law.
About the Authors
V. N. SidorovRussian Federation
Viktor N. SIDOROV, Associate Professor, Department of International Law, Cand. Sci. (Law)
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
E. V. Sidorova
Spain
Elena V. SIDOROVA, Doctoral Candidate, Charles III University of Madrid, PhD in Law
Bldg. 126, Madrid St., Madrid, Spain, 28903
References
1. BIMCO. BIMCO’s “25 by 25” campaign reaches 25.1 % eBL adoption in first year // URL: https://www.bimco.org/news-insights/bimco-news/2024/20240717-25-by25-campaign-adoption-in-first-year/.
2. DCSA. The State of the Industry 2024 — Insights on Digital Evolution in Container Shipping, a Report by DCSA // URL: https://go.dcsa.org/state-of-the-industry-report-2024.
3. Johnson D. R., Post D. G. Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace // Stanford Law Review. — 1996. — № 48. — Р. 1367—1402. — URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229390.
4. OECD. Digital trade // URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/digital-trade.html.
5. Pomfret R. ‘Regionalism’ and the global trade system // The World Economy. — 2021. — № 44 (9). — P. 2496—2514. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13155.
6. Schillinger H. R. El “lejano oeste” digital y la política comercial Controversias de política comercial en torno a la economía digital // Perspectivas. — 2018. — № 16.
7. Sourdin P., Pomfret R. Trade Facilitation Defining, Measuring, Explaining and Reducing the Cost of International Trade. — Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. — P. 71—109.
8. UNCTAD. Review of maritime transport 2024 // URL: https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024.
9. WTO. Briefing note: Trade facilitation — Cutting “red tape” at the border // URL: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/mc9_e/brief_tradfa_e.htm.
Review
For citations:
Sidorov V.N., Sidorova E.V. The Contribution of Uncitral to the Regulation of Electronic Commerce. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(12):174-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.136.12.174-181
JATS XML






















