The Formation of Fictious Legal Discourse within the Discourse of a Lesson
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.134.10.031-038
Abstract
The article focuses on the possibility of forming fictious legal discourse within the discourse of a lesson while teaching a foreign legal language to law students. Fictious legal discourse may develop in certain types of tasks. Basing on the analysis of the tasks performed, legal reasoning and the result obtained, linguistic, cognitive and pragmatic features typical of both real and fictious legal discourse have been described, they are cliches, arguments and cognitive structures (linguistic and legal stereotypes). It has been established that background knowledge and developed cognitive structures specific for real legal discourse are actualized in the fictious legal discourse contributing to proper task resolution and successful professional communication.
About the Authors
M. A. Vikulina
Moscow state linguistic university
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Vikulina, Assistant professor of the Department of Linguistics and professional communication in law of the Institute of international law and justice, Cand. Sci. (Philology),
36, Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034
L. V. Moiseenko
Moscow state linguistic university
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lilia V. Moiseenko, Head of the Department of Linguistics and professional communication in law of the Institute of international law and justice, Dr. Sci. (Philology), Professor,
36, Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034
References
1. Викулина М. А. Дискурсивный механизм формирования Лингвоправового стереотипа (на материале решений Верховного суда США): дис. ... канд. филол. наук. — М., 2021.
2. Воронин М. Ю., Моисеенко Л. В., Викулина М. А. Специфические параметры в аргументации как маркер интерференции англо-американского правового опыта // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. — 2021. — Т. 14. — № 6. — С. 16—22.
3. Карасик В. И. О категориях дискурса // Языковая личность: социолингвистические и эмотивные аспекты: сборник научных трудов. — Волгоград: Перемена, 1998. — С. 185—197.
4. Карасик В. И. О типах дискурса // Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс: сборник научных трудов / под ред. В. И. Карасика, Г. Г. Слышкина. — Волгоград: Перемена, 2000. — C. 5—20.
5. Карасик В. И. Язык социального статуса. — М., 2002.
Review
For citations:
Vikulina M.A., Moiseenko L.V. The Formation of Fictious Legal Discourse within the Discourse of a Lesson. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(10):31-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.134.10.031-038
Views:
185
JATS XML
Email this article 
