About Terminological Problems of Neuroprotection

Abstract

The article proposes, by analogy with the existing idea of creating a general legislative dictionary, to develop and implement a normative legal dictionary in the field of neuro-law. At first, such a dictionary could serve as a guideline for further research of neuropathology, but later, if necessary, it could become the basis for the legal consolidation of certain terms necessary for the further introduction of neuropathology as an independent legal branch of knowledge. It is proved that initially the general legislative dictionary on the field of neuroprotection could be adopted at the level of a decree of the Government of the Russian Federation, adopted on the basis of proposals from the scientific community, as well as various public authorities. Subsequently, it could become part of a higher-level regulatory act. In addition, the article examines the main terms that could become the basis for the formation of such a legislative dictionary and in the future, for the formation of a new branch of legislation — neuro-law. In particular, the article analyzes the concept of neuro-law, neurotechnology, neural networks, neuropsychology and others.