Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Web conference as a modern model of interaction between the court and participants in the process: shortcomings of legal regulation and prospects for use

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087

Abstract

The article analyzes the new provisions of civil procedural codes on participation in a court session by using a web conference system. The effectiveness of introducing online hearings into the process is assessed taking into account various factors of interaction between the court and the participants in the process (technical, psychological, legal). At the same time, the key question is whether the guarantees of the civil procedural form are preserved in such communication. The author comes to the conclusion that the existing legal regulation does not allow using the full potential of this modern technology, which could serve to strengthen a number of procedural guarantees. At the same time, insufficient regulation of such a format of interaction creates serious threats to the operation of the principle of immediacy and the closely related principle of objective (judicial) truth. The article suggests expanding the grounds for refusing to participate in court sessions online, and in cases where a legal issue is resolved in court sessions without summoning persons involved in the case, on the contrary, it is proposed to provide for mandatory online meetings.

About the Author

S. S. Kazikhanova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL); National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET)
Russian Federation

Svetlana S. Kazikhanova, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure;

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Institute of High-Tech Law, Social Sciences and Humanities,

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Горбенко К. Онлайн-зритель в судебном заседании: разные подходы судов // Адвокатская газета: офиц. сайт. — URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/onlayn-zritel-v-sudebnom-zasedanii-raznye-podkhody-sudov/ (дата обращения: 15.05.2023).

2. Гражданское процессуальное право России: учебник / под ред. С. Ф. Афанасьева. — М.: Юрайт, 2013.

3. Громошина Н. А. Дифференциация и унификация в гражданском судопроизводстве: дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук. — М., 2010.

4. Коробка Е. Верховный Суд приступил к рассмотрению дел в режиме веб-конференций // Адвокатская газета: офиц. сайт. — URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/verkhovnyy-sud-pristupil-k-rassmotreniyu-del-v-rezhime-veb-konferentsiy/ (дата обращения: 14.05.2023).

5. Лукьянова И. Н. Разрешение споров онлайн: технологичный путь к «приватизации правосудия» // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. — 2020. — № 8. — С. 45—48.

6. Туманов Д. А. Некоторые размышления о правосудии и оптимизации судопроизводства // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. — 2020. — № 8. — С. 7—13.

7. Цифровые технологии в гражданском и административном судопроизводстве: практика, аналитика, перспективы / М. В. Самсонова, Е. Г. Стрельцова [и др.] ; отв. ред. Е. Г. Стрельцова. — М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2022.


Review

For citations:


Kazikhanova S.S. Web conference as a modern model of interaction between the court and participants in the process: shortcomings of legal regulation and prospects for use. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;(10):79-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087

Views: 390


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)