Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Creative vision as a legal category: concept, legal nature, correlation with related categories

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.105.5.154-161

Abstract

The article considers the main views set out in the scientific literature, as well as in judicial practice, regarding the interpretation of the creative component in the creation of objects of intellectual activity. The meaning of creative work in the creation of such objects is analyzed — from pre-revolutionary lawyers to the modern understanding. The author distinguishes between mechanically created objects and creative objects, identifies two criteria that are necessary to recognize the object created by creative way: objective and subjective. The understanding and correlation of such categories as “creativity”, “creative work”, “creative vision”, “single creative idea”, “creative conception” is analyzed. It is the use of such categories that allows the court to establish the protectability of objects of exclusive rights, to distinguish complex and composite objects, as well as objects of independent creation and repetition of someone else’s work. The author of the article comes to the conclusion that for the definition of creativity as one of the components of the legal qualification necessary for the protectability of the object the most comprehensive is the concept of “creative vision”.

About the Author

N. A. Dorokhova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Dorokhova, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law, Cand. Sci. (Law) 

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Валеева Н. Г. Гражданско-правовой статус режиссеров-постановщиков как исполнителей особого рода / под ред. О. А. Кузнецовой, В. Г. Голубцова, Г. Я. Борисевич [и др.] // Пермский юридический альманах. Ежегодный научный журнал. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 195—203.

2. Витко В. С. Понятие формы произведения в авторском праве. — М. : Статут, 2020. — 268 с.

3. Гринь Е. С. Объекты авторских прав в индустрии моды // ИС. Авторское право и смежные права. — 2018. — № 6. — С. 39—44.

4. Копылов А. Ю. Творчество как условие охраноспособности произведения // Имущественные отношения в Российской Федерации. — 2019. — № 12. — С. 56—62.

5. Красавчиков О. А. Категории науки гражданского права // Избранные труды : в 2 т. — М. : Статут, 2005. — Т. 2. — 494 с.

6. Михайлова А. С. К вопросу о нотариате и современном цифровом искусстве // Нотариус. — 2022. — № 2.

7. Нестеров А. В. Критерий творчества: юридический аспект // Российский судья. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 31—37.

8. Чурилов А. Ю. К вопросу о творческом характере труда как критерии охраноспособности объектов авторского права // ИС. Авторское право и смежные права. — 2021. — № 1. — С. 21—26.

9. Шершеневич Г. Ф. Авторское право на литературные произведения. — Казань : Типография Императорского университета, 1891. — 313 с.


Review

For citations:


Dorokhova N.A. Creative vision as a legal category: concept, legal nature, correlation with related categories. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;(5):154-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.105.5.154-161

Views: 184


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)