Implementation of Information Technology in Parliamentary Activities
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.97.9.093-101
Abstract
Parliaments, because of their inherent conservatism, are not leaders in implementing information technology. But today it is becoming an urgent necessity. Information technology creates new opportunities for parliamentarians to communicate with each other and with other public authorities, accelerate the legislative process, and increase the effectiveness of parliamentary control. Most parliaments are aware of the need to adapt parliamentary activity to the conditions of digitalization. Today all parliaments have websites; many of them are beginning to introduce interactive communication with citizens, creating special chat rooms and electronic platforms for this purpose; some of them use artificial intelligence in their work. The take-up of information technology is uneven, with Latin American states going much further than their European counterparts on transparency of representative institutions and openness of legislators.
About the Author
T. A. VasilievaRussian Federation
TATIANA A. VASILIEVA, Chief Research Fellow, Human Rights Department, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
10, ul. Znamenka, Moscow, Russia, 119019
References
1. Brum Bernandes C., Leston Bandeira C. Information vs Engagement in in parliamentary websites — a case study of Brazil and the UK // Revista de Sociologia e Política. — 2016. — Vol. 24. — Nо. 59. — P. 91—107.
2. Carnevale P., Chinni D. To be or not to be (online)? Qualche considerazione sul rapport fra web e organi costituzionali // Liber Amicorum per Pasquale Costanzo — Diritto costituzionale in trasformazione. — Vol. 1. Costitutzionalismo, Reti e intelligenza artificiale. — Genova : Consulta Online, 2020. — P. 279—300.
3. Fitsilis F., Koryzis D., Svolopoulos V., Spiliotpoulos D. Implementing Digital Parliament Innovative Concepts for Citizens and Policy Makers // HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Interacting with Information Systems. 4th International Conference, HCIBGO 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017. Vancouver, BC, Canada. July 9—14, 2017. Proceedings, Part I / F. F.-H. Nah and C. H. Tan (eds.). — Cham : Springer, 2017. — P. 154—170.
4. Forteza P. Digital parliaments: Adapting democratic institutions to 21st century realities // Medium. URL: https://medium.com/participo/digital-parliaments-adaptingdemocratic-institutions-to-21st-century-realities-99214d352063 (дата обращения: 19.05.2022).
5. Good Practices on Transparency and Citizen Participation in the Legislatures of the Americas. — Ottawa : Parl Americas, 2017. — 68 p.
6. Leston-Bandeira C. The Impact of the Internet on Parliaments: a Legislative Studies Framework // Parliamentary Affairs. — 2007. — Vol. 60. — No. 4. — P. 655—674.
7. Leston-Bandeira C. Parliamentary Functions Portrayed on European Parliaments’ Websites // Revista de Sociologia e Politica. — 2009. — Vol. 17. — Nо. 34. — P. 13—27.
8. Mitozo I. B. Institutional Dynamics and the Development of e-Participation Tools in Brazil and the UK // E-legis. — 2021. — Vol. 14. — No. 36. — P. 12—31.
9. Moreno E. A., Traverso D. B. E-participation in Chilean Senate: delibirative online applications? // Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. — 2009. — Nо. 51. — Septiembre — Diciembre. — P. 186—211.
10. Setälä M., Grönlund K. Parliamentary websites: theoretical and comparative perspectives // Information Polity. — 2006. — Vol. 11. — No. 2. — P. 149—162.
11. Simon J., Dass T., Boelman V., Mulgan G. Digital Democracy. The tools transforming political engagement. February 2017 // Nesta. URL: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/digital_democracy.pdf (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Review
For citations:
Vasilieva T.A. Implementation of Information Technology in Parliamentary Activities. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2022;(9):93-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.97.9.093-101