Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

The universality of the participation of the prosecutor in the arbitration court when considering cases of an administrative offense

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.91.3.136-144

Abstract

The article studies the issue of initiation by the prosecutor of the administrative-jurisdictional process in the arbitration court; the features of the prosecutor’s decision to initiate a case on an administrative offense, enshrined in the law, are revealed, numerous examples from the practice of arbitration courts are given, confirming the effectiveness and diversity of the activities of the prosecutor’s office in this area. The author draws a conclusion about the uniqueness of the activities of the supervisory authority, in connection with which the emphasis is placed on the problem of unreasonable restriction of the powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process. The available theoretical research, as well as an analysis of the work of the prosecutor’s office in the field of protecting not only public, but public interests in various areas of legal relations, form the author’s conclusions about the need to make changes to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, as well as relevant additions to the Concept of a unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation related to the expansion of the powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process.

About the Author

T. S. Nazritskaya
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

T. S. NAZRITSKAYA, postgraduate student of the Department of organization of judicial and prosecutorial investigative activities, Prosecutor of the Department for Supervision of the Execution of Easy on Minors of the Prosecutor’s Office of Moscow

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Барзилова И. С. Проблемы развития современного российского законодательства // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 4. — С. 92—101.

2. Мирoшниченкo М. Н. Проблемы обеспечения представительства и защиты интepeсов органов пpoкуратуры в apбитражном процecсе // Законность. — 2018. — № 11.

3. Отческая Т. И. Процессуальные аспекты участия прокурора в арбитражном процессе // Актуальные проблемы российского права. — 2018. — № 2.

4. Пpoкурорская пpoверка. Методика и тактика пpoведения : учебнoe пособие / пoд рeд. O. Н. Кopшуновой. — 2-е изд., пеpepаб. и дoп. — М. : Юcтиция, 2019.

5. Субapова Н. Опpeделениe oб отказе в вoзбуждeнии дела oб aдминистpaтивнoм пpaвонарyшении // Зaконнoсть. — 2011. — № 1.

6. Тyманов Д. А. O понимании общественного интepеса Е. В. Вaськoвским и o знaчeнии его воззрений пo этому вoпpосу для современного пpава и процесса // Вестник Университета имени О. Е. Кyтафина (МГЮA). — 2017. — № 3. — С. 160—171.


Review

For citations:


Nazritskaya T.S. The universality of the participation of the prosecutor in the arbitration court when considering cases of an administrative offense. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2022;(3):136-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.91.3.136-144

Views: 197


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)