The Principle of Immediacy and Elusive Circumstances
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.88.12.120-127
Abstract
The article discusses the problems of direct cognition by the court of the circumstances of the case. Arguments are proposed for solving the issue of procedural limitations of the court in the knowledge of facts directly. It was also proposed to amend Art. 157 CCP, Art. 10 of the CAP, securing the right of the court to establish facts through their direct knowledge.
The article also discusses the question of whether elusive circumstances can have a procedural significance in the formation of an internal judicial conviction. Turning to the latest technological solutions may present such an opportunity. The use of IT in this direction brings the judicial conviction out of the dark zone, turning the elusive inner conviction into evidentiary facts, with which the judge can justify his trust or distrust of a witness, a party, or a third party.
About the Author
E. G. StreltsovaRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor at the Department of Civil and Administrative Judicial Proceedings
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Гражданское процессуальное право : учебник / С. А. Алёхина, В. В. Блажеев [и др.] ; под ред. М. С. Шакарян. — М. : Велби ; Проспект, 2004.
2. Курылев С. В. Избранные труды. — Минск, 2012.
3. Цифровые технологии в гражданском и административном судопроизводстве: практика, аналитика, перспективы. — М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2022.
Review
For citations:
Streltsova E.G. The Principle of Immediacy and Elusive Circumstances. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2021;(12):120-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.88.12.120-127