Bioethics: from Enlightenment to return
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.84.8.053-061
Abstract
Based on the concept adopted by the Russian legislator in the field of bioethics, the articleanalyzes aspects of the formation of moral and ethical regulations as a subject of legal regulation, a historical review of the features of the perception by the individual and society of ethical norms as criteria for self-restraint of the possibility of choosing options for lawful or unlawful behavioris given. The transformation of law from the age of enlightenment to the era of return to ethical institutions is shown both in the historical periods of the outgoing era and in the examples of negative law-making of contemporaries, in order to leave the norms of ethics outside the national order.
The traditional explanation of the dominance of such an approach to the legal regulation of ethical institutions is reduced to the absence of objects of legal support due to the fact that ethics is not a legal, but a moral one. De facto ethical norms are introduced into the modern legal order of the Russian Federation at the level of law enforcement activities, for example, through the adoption of Codes of Professional Ethics. The expediency of formation in Russia of the National Council on Bioethics and Biosafety is substantiated.
About the Author
A. V. PekshevRussian Federation
Associate Professor of the Chair of Medical Law, Cand. Sci. (Medical), Associate professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Гришина Н. В. Психология конфликта. — 2-е изд. — СПб. : Питер, 2008. — 544 с.
2. Мохов А. А. Биомедицина и концепция четырех «био» // Философские проблемы биологии и медицины: вызовы техногенной цивилизации — интегративная философия мироподобия : 14-я ежегодная конференция. — М. : Ленанд, 2020. — С. 119—122.
3. Мохов А. А. О Национальном совете по биоэтике и биобезопасности // Вестник Росздравнадзора. — 2021. — № 2. — С. 23—29.
4. Мохов А. А. «Синтетический» геном и получаемые с его использованием продукты как новые объекты правоотношений // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2020. — № 5 (69). — С. 51—59.
5. Нойман Э. Глубинная психология и новая этика. — М. : Академический проект, 1999. — 208 с.
6. Орехов С. Н., Яворский А. Н. Биологические угрозы и биологическая безопасность // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2020. — № 5 (69). — С. 60—73.
7. Пекшев А. В. Доверие как категория биоэтики и ее значение в системе обеспечения биобезопасности // Юрист. — 2020. — № 12. — С. 21—26.
8. Kolakowski L. God Owes Us Nothing: A Brief remark on Pascal’s religion and on the spirit of jansenism // University of Chicago press. — May 1998. — 248 p.
Review
For citations:
Pekshev A.V. Bioethics: from Enlightenment to return. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2021;1(8):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.84.8.053-061