Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Constitutional ideas of the Enlightenment era and the legal doctrine of Catherine II

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.104-110

Abstract

 The article substantiates the position that the teachings of the Enlightenment were compatible with the foundations of class society and  absolute monarchy. The formation of the branch of constitutional law is  usually associated with the “Great Rebellion” and “Glorious Revolution” in England. However, as a result of the English revolution, an unwritten constitution appeared, the interpretation of which gave rise to three  approaches: the “divine right” of R. Filmer, the theory of the social contract of J. R. Tolkien. Locke and the theory of the “ancient constitution”. The foundation of the science of constitutional law was laid by the teachings of the Enlightenment of the XVIII century. The ideas of “natural” equality, personal and political rights and freedoms, the restriction of “despotism” by law and the separation of powers contradicted the foundations of class society and absolute monarchies, but they were compatible with them. Enlightenment figures held positions in the royal service or were influential writers of their time. The doctrine and lawmaking of the “enlightened”  monarchy of Catherine II was based on these teachings, which led to the assimilation of a number of constitutional and legal ideas and the formation of state law of the Russian Empire. 

About the Author

M. O. Аkishin
Pushkin Leningrad State University
Russian Federation

 Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Dr. Sci. (History),  Cand. Sci. (Law), Professor 

10, Peterburgskoe shosse, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 196605 



References

1. Грацианский П. С. Политическая и правовая мысль России второй половины XVIII в. — М. : Наука, 1984. — 253 с.

2. Дашкова Е. Р. О смысле слова «воспитание» : сочинения, письма, документы. — СПб. : Дмитрий Буланин, 2001. —455 c.

3. Исаев И. А. Основная норма («скрижали революционного закона») // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 8. — С. 20—33.

4. Кабузан В. М. Изменения в размещении населения России в XVIII — первой половине XIX в. (по материалам ревизий). — М. : Наука, 1971. — 190 с.

5. Кизеветтер А. А. Городовое положение Екатерины II 1785 г.: опыт исторического комментария. — М. : Тип. имп. Моск. ун-та, 1909. — 473 с.

6. Омельченко О. А. «Законная монархия» Екатерины Второй : Просвещенный абсолютизм в России. — М. : Юрист, 1993. — 428 с.

7. Русский архив : историко-литературный сборник. — Вып. 3. — М. : Тип. В. Грачева и Ко, 1866.

8. Сочинения императрицы Екатерины II. — СПб. : Имп. Акад. наук, 1901. — Т. 12.

9. Чечулин Н. Д. Об источниках «Наказа» // Журнал Министерства народного просвещения. — 1902, апр. — С. 279—320.


Review

For citations:


Аkishin M.O. Constitutional ideas of the Enlightenment era and the legal doctrine of Catherine II. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2021;(5):104-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.104-110

Views: 1441


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)