Nature of new power of supervision and judicial supervision
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.66.2.173-191
Abstract
The article provides an overview of the reform of the surveillance system in the People’s Republic of China. The establishment of the supervisory commission is conducive to the integration and optimization of anticorruption forces and building up a centralized, unified, authoritative and efficient supervision system. However, the anti-corruption mechanism has also moved towards centralized from decentralized, and the mixture of powers with different natures has increased risks and uncertainties in the process of supervision. On the one hand, the balance of legal powers among state organs is touched; on the other hand, it is not conducive to the protection of rights of the investigated.
About the Author
Mingyu Liu
Sun Yat-sen University
China
China
Liu MINGYU, Lecturer an Nafang College
Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 882 Wenquan Ave, Conghua District
References
1. Chen Guangzhong, Cui Jie. The Chinese Interpretation of Judicature and Judicial Organs // China Law. — 2008. — 277.
2. Chen Ruihua Nature of Judicial Power: An Analysis Based on Criminal Justice // Law Research. — 2000. — 55.
3. Chen Yongge. On Characteristics of Hong Kong’s ICAC System and Its Revelation to Law // Tsinghua Law Abstract. — 2003. — 182.
4. Hu Jianmiao The Theory of ‘Special Power Relations ‘ and China’s Administrative Legislation: Taking ‘Administrative Procedure Law ‘Civil Servant Act ’ as an Example // Chinese Jurisprudence. — 2005. — 65.
5. Li Hongbo. Towards Supervisory Commission: Power to Oversee Transformation of Law in China // Law Abstract. — 2017. — 153.
6. Ma Huaide. Important Significance and Main Task of National Supervision System Reform // Journal of National Administration Institute. — 2016. — 18.
7. Maurer. General introduction to administrative law, at 110 / Gao Jiawei trans. Law Press, 2000.
8. Manion M. Corruption and corruption control: more of the same in 1996. — Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1997.
9. Qin Qianhong. Dilemma, Reform and Way Out: From ‘Troika’ to National Supervision: Constitutional Reflections on China’s Supervision System // China Law Abstract. — 2017. — 182.
10. Radbruch. Introduction to law, at 101 / Mi Jian trans. — China Encyclopedia Publishing House, 2003.
11. Sun Changyong Investigation procedure and human rights. — China Founder Press, 2000.
12. Tian Henzhu Comparative study of asian anti-corruption legal mechanism. Chinese People`s Public Security University Press, 2009.
13. Tong Zhiwei. How to Strengthen Supervisory Control of Supervisory Commission // Law Abstract. — 2017. — 2.
14. Wang Jingui. ‘Shuanggui` and ‘Surrender`: Research on Constitutionality // Law Science. — 2005. — 62.
15. Yuan Ming, Zhang Qingbin, Zhu Rongli. Understanding and Application of Comments on Investigation and Supervision Department to Investigate and Verify Illegal Acts (for Trial Implementation) // People of the Public Prosecutor’s Office. 2014. — 40.
16. Zhang Jianwei. A New Supervisory System in the Field of Due Process of Law // Global Law Abstract. — 2017. — 62.
17. Wang Kai, Wang Xinyang. How to Supervise the Supervisors: Discussion about Litigation Supervision of the Supervisory Commission // Zhejiang Social Science. 2017. — 20.
Review
For citations:
Liu M. Nature of new power of supervision and judicial supervision. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2020;(2):173-191. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.66.2.173-191
Views:
340
Email this article 
