Ethical aspects and personal data protection in the execution of home prison penalty
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.66.2.160-172
Abstract
The home prison penalty is currently a part of the sanction system in the Slovak Republic and serves as a manifestation of so-called restorative justice. Restorative justice is represented by alternative sentences that are distinguished from real imprisonment for minor offences. Alternative penalties may include penalties that do not involve the deprivation of liberty associated with the isolation of a convicted person. The advantage of alternative sentences is that the offender is spared the destructive effects of imprisonment. The offender is not exposed to the negative aspects of this punishment and remains integrated into the society, being able to continue to maintain social, family and working relations, which can significantly improve the protection from the offender.
At present, there are many unresolved issues regarding the execution of the punishment of home prison penalty, especially its execution through electronic monitoring, including the protection of personal data obtained through electronic monitoring equipment. Thus, the purpose of this article is to focus on these issues and present the authors’ views.
About the Authors
L. Michalov
University of Pavel Joseph Shafarik in Kosice
Slovakia
Slovakia
LUCAS MICHALOV, Doctor of Law, Professor, Faculty of Law
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9
D. Treshchakova
University of Pavel Joseph Shafarik in Kosice
Slovakia
Slovakia
DIANA TRESHCHAKOVA, Doctor of Law, Professor, Faculty of Law
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9
References
1. Hučková R., Sokol P., Rózenfeldová L.4th industrial revolution and challenges for european law (with special attention to the concept of digital single market) // EU and comparative law issues and challenges series: Eu law in context adjustment to membership and challenges of the enlargement : International Scientific Conference. Osijek : Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, 2018. S. 201—215 // URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eclic/issue/view/313/ Vol. 2.
2. Klátik J. Uplatňovanie restoratívnej justície a elektronického monitoringu na Slovensku a vo vybraných štátoch Európskej únie. I. Košické dni trestného práva Perspektívy vývoja európskeho trestného práva. — Košice : Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, 2018.
3. Rajnič M. Trest domáceho väzenia v systéme trestov // Justičná revue. — 2009. — 61. — Č. 6—7.
4. Suchoža J., Husár J., Hučková R. (eds.) Právo, obchod, ekonomika. — IX. Košice : Univerzita P. J. Šafárika v Košiciach, 2019.
5. Tóthová V., Ferenčíková S. Innovation in criminal policy of imposing alterantive sanctions in Slovak Republic // P. Hájek, & O. Vít (ed.). CBU International Conference Proceedings. — Prague : CBU Research Institute, 2019. — P. 661—670.
6. VeselýP.Pseudonymizácia a anonymizácia osobných údajov ako požiadavka gdpr // URL: https://www.zoou.sk/33/pseudonymizacia-a-anonymizacia-osobnych-udajovako-poziadavka-gdpr-uniqueidmrrwsbk196fpkydaflfwajwc7pg-xzb6xqjg803ba64/.
7. ŽuľováJ.Profilovanie a automatizované rozhodovanie (nielen) v pracovnoprávnych vzťahoch. in švec, m. — bulla, m. (eds). Práca 4.0, digitálna spoločnosť a pracovné právo. — Bratislava : Friedrich ebert stiftung, 2018.
Review
For citations:
Michalov L., Treshchakova D. Ethical aspects and personal data protection in the execution of home prison penalty. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2020;(2):160-172. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.66.2.160-172
Views:
312
Email this article 
