Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Editorial Policies

Aim and Scope

The Journal is the University leading periodical, which defines its goals and objectives in the field of development of the University as a modern scientific, educational, analytical and consulting interdisciplinary centre capable of making a significant theoretical and practical contribution to the development of mechanisms of Russia’s innovative development. This defines the aims and objectives of the journal.

Aims: 

— to monitor the contribution of the University scholarship to the development of legal science;

— to publicize the results of the most significant research and studies.

Objectives:

— to monitor the work of the University scholarship and faculty in various branches of law aimed at solving practical problems;

— to give greater publicity to research work carried out by undergraduate and postgraduate students;

— to inform the readers about historical documents;

— to give greater publicity to papers representing the legacy of scholars of the past;

— to give greater publicity to the scientific life of the University;

— to publish proceedings of international conferences and symposia held with the participation of the  faculty  of the University;

— to facilitate awareness with regard to materials that contribute to the increase of intellectual and general educational level of the University faculty, postgraduate and undergraduate students.

 

Section Policies

A WORD TO THE READERS
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE -

is devoted to theoretical and practical issues of legal science and complies with the subject of each issue. The section also deals with the problems of teaching and improving methodology of teaching, scientific life of the faculty, provides information about published monographs, teaching aids, textbooks, research papers of young teachers and graduate students.

Permanent headings of the section:

— Authoritative Opinion (Dictum);

— Educational Environment;

— Young Scientist's Stand;

— Digest of the Department Events;

— Bookshelf of the Department.

In addition, the section has non-permanent headings. They are determined by the department responsible for the issue in the context of the subject of the issue.
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
KUTAFIN UNIVERSITY CHRONICLE -

contains information about the most significant University events. 

Section headings:

— Key Events of the Month;

— Conferences, Round Tables, Presentations;

— Rectorate Events;

— International Projects;

— University Saturdays;

— Development of the University.
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
LAW IN HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION -

deals with normative legal acts of Russia in full or in part, excerpts from the writings of scholars of the past, materials devoted to legal topics published at the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries.

Section headings:

— Law Heritage;

— Legal Legacy;

— From the Periodicals of the Past;

— A Portrait against the Background of History.
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
POST SCRIPTUM - deals with popular science publications covering the issues of historical development, national language, rhetoric, etc.
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
TRIBUNE FOR YOUNG SCIENTIST
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
TRIBUNE FOR YOUNG SCIENTIST
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
DIGEST OF THE FACULTY ACTIVITIES
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Foreign experience
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
LAW IN HISTORICAL REFRACTION. Legal heritage
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Budget law and process
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Tax law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
ПРАВОВАЯ ПОЗИЦИЯ
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
UNITED NATIONS AND RUSSIA
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. CURRENT PROBLEMS OF UN ACTIVITIES
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
ПРАКТИКА МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО СУДА ООН
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
UNIVERSITY CHRONICLE IN THE ANNIVERSARY YEAR
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Human rights in the modern world
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Legal Background for Genetic Research
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Patient health law protection
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF HEALTHCARE LAW
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
POSTSCRIPT. OUT OF CURIOSITY
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Civil liability
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Development of civil legislation
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Civil law contract
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Sciences of the criminal cycle
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
REVIEWS
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
CLOSING REMARKS BY THE EXECUTIVE EDITOR OF THE ISSUE
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION OFFICE BOOKSHELF 2021
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Actual problems of information law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Cyber Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
NOTE TO THE READERS
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Legal Practice
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Foreign Criminal Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Countering drug trafficking
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
LAW IN HISTORICAL REFRACTION. Legal legacy
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Startup movement
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Startup movement
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Family Entrepreneurship
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Legal regulation of banking activity
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Standpoint
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Artificial intelligence
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Legal protection of wildlife (
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
EXPERT OPINION
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
LAW IN HISTORICAL REFRACTION. Milestones in history
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
LAW IN HISTORICAL REFRACTION. Scientific Legacy
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Ontology of law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. State, law and society
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Expert opinion
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
IN MEMORY OF V. A. RYASENTSEV
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Artificial Intelligence and Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Family law relations
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Theoretical aspects of civil law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Topical issues of medical law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Legal regimes of economic activity
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Family & Women’s Entrepreneurship
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
STANDPOINT
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
IN MEMORY OF EKATERINA IVANOVNA KOZLOVA
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
PROFESSOR E. I. KOZLOVA IS A THEORIST OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LINGUISTIC SCIENCE. Language and Translation Issues
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Fundamentals of Criminal Procedure
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Pre-trial criminal proceedings
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Criminal Proceedings
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Theoretical Aspects of Labor Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Criminal law risks
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Balance of Interests in Corporate Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE Artificial Intelligence in Banking
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
SCIENTIFIC EVENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING LAW
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Artificial Intelligence and Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Quantum Technology Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
YOUNG LAWYERS ARE THE FUTURE OF RUSSIA
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Digitalization of Civil Circulation
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Innovative Cooperation
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Neurolaw
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Transport Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Conceptual Aspects of Civil Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Contract law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Intellectual Property Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Sociodynamics of Legal Culture
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Sustainable agriculture
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Corporate Law in the BRICS Countries
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Dispute Resolution Issues
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
VECTOR OF LEGAL SCIENCE. Digital Law
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MODERN WORLD
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
MODERN MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
SELECTED ISSUES OF LEGAL UNDERSTANDING AND ENFORCEMENT
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Publication Frequency

12 issues per year

 

Open Access Policy

"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)"  is an open access journal. All articles are made freely available to readers immediatly upon publication.

Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself.

For more information please read BOAI statement.

 

 

Archiving

  • Russian State Library (RSL)
  • National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)

 

Peer-Review

All submitted manuscripts are subject to peer review. The task of the review procedure is to promote careful selection of manuscripts for publication and to make specific recommendations for their improvement. The review procedure is focused on the most objective assessment of the content of the paper. Only manuscripts representing scientific value are accepted for publication. The main purpose of the review procedure is to eliminate cases of poor scientific research and plagiarism.

 

Publishing Ethics

The Editorial Council of the Journal is guided in its work by international ethical rules of scientific publications, including principles of confidentiality, peer review, consideration of possible conflicts interests, etc. The Editorial Office relies in its work on the experience of reputable domestic and international journals and publishers.

Any manuscript submitted for reviewing should be treated as a confidential document. Unpublished materials should not be used in the manuscript without the written consent of the author.

Ethical Policy

1. General provisions

1.1. This Policy establishes standards of ethical conduct for all the parties involved in the publication of manuscripts in the "Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)" Journal (Journal): Editorial Board, peer-reviewers, authors and readers.

This Policy is based on recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), in particular, on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, as well as the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in the Scholarly Publishing.

1.2. For the purposes of this Policy:

  • Editorial Board is all the persons engaged in the production and publishing of the Journal, including the Editor-in- Chief, members of the Editorial Council, and journalistic staff.
  • Manuscript is any scientific article, essay, critical review, overview, translations of regulatory legal acts, international agreements and other documents.

1.3. The founder and publisher of the Journal is Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kutafin Moscow State Law University" (MSAL)

2. Ethical standards of the activities of Editorial Board are as follows:

2.1. The decisions of Editorial Board on admission or rejection of manuscripts will be based on significance, originality, clarity and accuracy of the material and its relevance to the area of focus of the Journal.

2.2. All submitted for publication articles are subject to review by competent specialists in the manner and on the basis of the rules established by Editorial Board. The decision on the possibility of publication of a manuscript is made only after receiving the results of the review.

Overviews, critical reviews, translations, and other materials of informative character are not subject to review.

2.3. Editorial Board does not publish Manuscripts that clearly contain incorrect information, plagiarism, libel and defamation, as well as those violating norms of ethics and scientific communication.

2.4. The changes to the membership of Editorial Board do not entail the revocation of previous decisions regarding admitted manuscripts.

2.5. The decision on admission for publication in the future may be withdrawn in the event of serious violations on the part of the author.

2.6. Gender, race, colour, ethnic origin, property, marital, social and official status, age, place of residence, attitude to religion, beliefs, institutional affiliation of the author, as well as other circumstances not related to the academic characteristics of the manuscript do not affect its assessment and decision-making on the part of Editorial Board.

2.7. The final decision on publication of a manuscript is made by Editor-in-Chief of the Journal.

2.8. Editorial Board does not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, peer reviewers, and founder (Publisher).

2.9. Editorial Board shall not use unpublished information contained in the manuscripts for their own purposes without written consent of the authors.

2.10. In the event of a conflict of interest as a result of competitive, cooperative or other relationships with any of the authors, a member of Editorial Board declares his self-disqualification and asks another member of Editorial Board to consider the manuscript for publication.

2.11. Editorial Board will take necessary actions in respect of breaches of ethics or the discovery of plagiarism in submitted for publication or published manuscripts, regardless of when the manuscript was published. First and foremost Editorial Board will address the author of the manuscript for clarification on the identified violations.

If the information about the breaches of ethics or plagiarism proves to be consistent, it will be communicated to the public through publication in the next issue of the Journal.

2.12. In the event of the discovery of significant errors or inaccuracies in the information provided, Editorial Board immediately notifies the author and does not publish the manuscript until the errors or inaccuracies are corrected.

When detecting significant errors or discrepancies in the published manuscript, Editorial Board immediately notifies the author and takes all necessary and reasonable measures to correct them and eliminate negative effects.

3. Ethical standards for reviewers:

3.1. Peer review should be conducted as objectively as possible. All comments must be clearly defined and explained so that authors can use them to improve the manuscript. Criticism, based purely on the personal views of the reviewer, is inappropriate.

3.2. Peer-reviewers should, if possible, point out the relevant work that has not been explored by the author of the work in question.

3.3. Peer-reviewers must notify Editorial Board of any substantial similarity or equivalence of the manuscript under review and any other work (published or unpublished) he is aware of.

3.4. In case the peer-reviewers find significant errors, inaccurate information, plagiarism or other violations, they must immediately inform Editorial Board.

3.5. Peer-reviewers must immediately inform Editorial Board in cases of breaches of ethical norms on the part of the authors in the reviewed manuscripts.

3.6. Peer-reviewers must not disclose any information about the manuscripts under consideration, must not discuss the manuscript with anyone other than Editorial Board unless other is permitted by the decision of the Editor-in-Chief.

3.7. Peer-reviewers shall not use unpublished information contained in the manuscripts submitted for publication for their own purposes.

3.8. In case of a conflict of interest as a result of competitive and cooperative relationships and/or other connections with any of the authors (if for any reason it becomes known) Peer-reviewers declare their self-disqualification and ask Editorial Board to appoint different Peer-reviewers to consider the manuscript.

3.9. Peer-reviewers shall immediately notify Editorial Board in case they fail to complete a qualified scientific assessment of a manuscript under review on time.

4. Ethical standards for the authors:

4.1. Since the authors bear public responsibility for the content of the manuscript, the authors are only deemed to be the persons who match the following criteria simultaneously:

  1. having made a significant contribution to the narrative of manuscripts, data collection or analysis/interpretation of the study and its results;
  2. having prepared the manuscript or significantly reviewed it in terms of intellectual content;
  3. having approved of the final manuscript and having agreed on its submission for publication.

All persons who contributed greatly to the creation of the manuscript (e.g. technical assistance, assistance in editing, general support), but do not meet the above mentioned criteria must not be listed as authors.

The authors submitting the manuscript to Editorial Board must ensure that all the co-authors (as defined above) are included in the list of authors, and no other persons are included, as well as to ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved of the final manuscript and agreed on its submission for publication.

4.2. The authors must submit original and scientifically reliable manuscripts, and then participate in an objective discussion about the significance of their work, including responses to comments on the official website of the Journal. The manuscript must contain sufficient details and links. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, and also contain the author's opinion.

4.3. The use in the manuscript of a priori inaccurate, false information is considered unethical and unacceptable behavior.

4.4. The authors must ensure that their submitted manuscripts are completely original works, and that any use of works and/or texts of other persons is duly registered (as references).

4.5. Plagiarism in all its forms is unethical behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism means the representation by the authors of someone else's manuscript as his own, copying or paraphrasing essential parts of a foreign manuscript without attribution, claiming the results and conclusions of other researches as their own.

4.6. One and the same manuscript must not be published in more than one journal or any other source. The authors must not submit the manuscript that has already been published in other sources. In case of submission of the manuscript for publication in several journals, authors must inform Editorial Board. Failure to follow this rule is considered unethical and unacceptable behavior.

The publication of certain types of manuscripts (e.g., reviews, translations, etc.) in more than one source is allowed in certain cases, subject to the following conditions:

  1. the authors, the editorial boards of journals and other stakeholders must explicitly give assent to the secondary publication;
  2. the secondary publication should reflect the basic provisions of the primary material, can complement them, but cannot contradict them;
  3. the secondary publication should refer to the original source of publication.

4.7. When submitting the manuscripts for publication, the authors shall inform of any cases of any conflicts of interest. Possible information showing a conflict of interest, which must be disclosed, includes financial (fees, educational grants or other sources of funding, patent-licensing agreements, etc.) and non-financial (personal or professional relationships, communication) benefits. All sources of financial support must be disclosed (including grant number or other data when available).

4.8. The authors warrant that they duly examined other works on the subject and shall refer to the publications having a significant impact on the nature of the submitted manuscript and the conclusions made. The information received in private (from conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties) must not be used without the express written permission of their source. The author shall not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, if they have not received the express written permission of the person who these services were provided to.

4.9. The authors are obliged to participate in the review process and to cooperate fully by immediately responding to all requests from Editorial Board. In case of primary decision to improve the submitted manuscript the authors must respond to all the remarks and comments of their peer-reviewers, as well as timely modify and resubmit the manuscript by the due date.

4.10. In case the authors detect significant errors or discrepancies after submitting the manuscript for publication or after the publication, they are obliged to immediately notify Editorial Board and cooperate with them in order to fix the errors.

In case Editorial Board notifies the authors of the presence of significant errors or discrepancies in the published manuscripts, they undertake to promptly correct the errors or inaccuracies or to provide proof that the manuscript contains no such errors or inaccuracies.

3. Ethical standards for the readers:

5.1. The readers must use any materials and data published in Journal correctly.

5.2. Any use of published materials is allowed only with reference to Journal as the original source of publication.

5.3. In case the reader finds significant errors, inaccurate information, plagiarism or other violations, they must immediately notify Editorial Board via contacts specified in section "Contacts".

 

Founder

  • Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)"

 

Author fees

Publication in Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)is free of charge for all the authors.

The journal doesn't have any Article processing charges.

The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Plagiarism detection

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

 

Preprint and postprint Policy

Prior to acceptance and publication in Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)", authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.

As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)" we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.

Glossary (by SHERPA)

Preprint - In the context of Open Access, a preprint is a draft of an academic article or other publication before it has been submitted for peer-review or other quality assurance procedure as part of the publication process. Preprints cover initial and successive drafts of articles, working papers or draft conference papers.

Postprint - The final version of an academic article or other publication - after it has been peer-reviewed and revised into its final form by the author. As a general term this covers both the author's final version and the version as published, with formatting and copy-editing changes in place.

 

Subscription and distribution

The journal is distributed through “Press of Russia” joint catalogue and the Internet catalogue of “Kniga-Servis” Agency. Subscription Index: 40650. Journal subscription is possible from any month.