Ensuring Financial Security under Conditions of International Disintegration (Legal Models of the USA, the UK, the EU and China in Comparative Perspective)
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2026.139.3.105-111
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comparative legal analysis of models of financial security in the context of international disintegration. It examines the theoretical and legal foundations of fi nancial sovereignty as a political and legal phenomenon associated with national security. Based on an analysis of strategic documents and practices of the USA, the UK, the EU, and the PRC, four models are identifi ed: hegemonic (USA), institutional-balancing (UK), supranational (EU), and sovereign-autonomous (PRC). The transformation of international law under the influence of restrictive measures is revealed, manifested in the crisis of universalism and the formation of competing legal regimes. It is concluded that there is no universal model for ensuring financial security and that the role of law is increasing in creating a new polycentric architecture of international financial relations.
About the Author
D. V. Galushko
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Galushko - Professor at the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activities of Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Dr. Sci. (Law)
49/2, Leningradskii prosp., Moscow, 125167
References
1. Васянина Е. Л. Правовое обеспечение финансового суверенитета Российской Федерации в эпоху глобальных перемен // Пролог: журнал о праве. — 2024. — № 1 (41). — С. 35—42. — DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2024.1.4.
2. Галушко Д. В. Теория и практика правового регулирования интеграционных процессов в свете вызовов Брекзита : дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. — М., 2023.
3. Галушко Д. В. Юридическая сущность Европейского союза в современных реалиях // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. — Серия : Право. — 2020. — № 1 (40). — С. 234—241. — DOI: 10.17308/vsu.proc. law.2020.1/2413.
4. Кузнецов А. В. Дезинтеграция мировой торговой системы: причины и следствия // Финансы: теория и практика. — 2019. — Т. 23. — № 5. — С. 50—61. — DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-5-50-61.
5. Петров М., Пилипосян А., Ткачев В. Китай: обретение финансовой власти // Международные процессы. — 2019. — Т. 17. — № 3. — С. 6—20. — DOI: 10.17994/IT.2019.17.3.58.1.
6. Саттарова Н. А. О специальном правовом режиме финансовой деятельности государства в условиях экономических санкций // Финансовое право. — 2024. — № 2. — С. 15—17. — DOI: 10.18572/1813-1220-2024-2-15-17.
7. Adachi A., Brown A., Zenglein M. Fasten your seatbelts: How to manage China’s economic coercion // MERICS China Monitor. — Mercator Institute for China Studies, 2022. 25 August.
8. Bevilacqua M. The Reform of the EU Fiscal Rules: Strengthening Economic Protectionism in the Union // Verfassungsblog. — 2024. 6 May.
9. Farrell H., Newman A. The New Economic Security State // Foreign Affairs. — 2023. — November-December.
10. Hackenbroich J., Medunic F., Zerka P. Tough trade: the hidden costs of economic coercion : Policy Brief. — European Council on Foreign Relations, February 2022.
11. Hall J. Financial stability and growth: The Financial Policy Committee’s mandate and the question of balance // Bank of England. — 2025. 23 October.
12. Kaltenbrunner A., Lysandrou P. The US Dollar’s Continuing Hegemony as an International Currency: A Double-matrix Analysis // Development And Change. — 2017. — Vol. 48. — No. 4. — P. 663—691. — DOI: 10.1111/dech.12318.
13. Leonard M., Pisani-Ferry J., Ribakova E., Shapiro J., Wolff G. Redefining Europe’s economic sovereignty // Bruegel Policy Contribution. — 2019. — № 9.
14. Maruyama W., Wolff A. Saving the WTO from the national security exception // PIIE Working Paper. — 2023. — 23-2.
15. Monjal P.-Y. The protection of the EU’s financial interests: an autonomous concept serving the protection of the key legal principles of the European Union law // International Conference at the Akdeniz University of Antalya (Turkey). — 2025. 22 October.
16. Petry J., Nölke A. Seeking Autonomy Beyond Subordination: Chinese Financial Statecraft and the e-CNY // State, Capitalism, and Finance in Emerging Markets / ed. by J. Petry, A. Nölke. — Bristol : Bristol University Press, 2025. — P. 162—182.
17. Ruys T., Ryngaert C., Rodríguez Silvestre F. Secondary Sanctions and International Economic Law // The Cambridge Handbook of Secondary Sanctions and International Law / ed. by T. Ruys, C. Ryngaert, F. Rodríguez Silvestre. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2024. — P. 239—330.
Review
For citations:
Galushko D.V. Ensuring Financial Security under Conditions of International Disintegration (Legal Models of the USA, the UK, the EU and China in Comparative Perspective). Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2026;(3):105-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2026.139.3.105-111
Views:
77
JATS XML
Email this article 
