Cybercrime in the Regions of Russia: Current Trends and Preventive Measures
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.129.5.034-047
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study on current trends in cybercrime across federal districts and regions of the Russian Federation. The authors emphasize that effective prevention of cybercrime requires analyzing its characteristics not only at the national level but also at the regional level. This approach makes it possible to identify the specific features of criminal victimization in different regions, rank them accordingly, and uncover problems related to ensuring regional security across various parts of Russia. It also enables the timely development of scientifically grounded recommendations aimed at improving measures to reduce regional criminal victimization.
Among the main contemporary trends in cybercrime, the authors highlight the steady increase in cybercrime rates both across Russia as a whole and in all federal districts, despite the overall decline in crime. Other noted trends include a high level of latency and a low detection rate. The study also notes an increase in the involvement of organized criminal groups in cybercrime, greater financial damage from cyberattacks, and the emergence of new threat forms. A pronounced territorial differentiation of cybercrime has been identified, driven by the combined influence of demographic, sociocultural, organizational, and technological factors.
About the Authors
O. R. AfanasievaRussian Federation
Olga R. Afanasieva, Professor of the Chair of Criminology and Executive Law Chair named after E. V. Eminov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor,
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
V. I. Shiyan
Russian Federation
Valentina I. Shiyan, Associate Professor at the Department of Legal Support of National Security, Legality and Law and Order, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor,
82/1, рrоsр. Vernadsky, Moscow, 119571
References
1. Бойко О. А., Унукович А. С. Детерминанты латентных преступлений, совершаемых с использованием информационно-коммуникационных технологий // Юридический вестник Самарского университета. — 2020. — Т. 6. — № 3. — С. 53—59.
2. Доклад руководителя МВД Коми за 2024 год // URL: https://uhta.bezformata.com/listnews/komi-za-2024-god/144219358/ (дата обращения: 29.03.2025).
3. Латентность киберпреступности превысила 60 % — Сидоренко // РАПСИ — Российское агентство правовой и судебной информации. URL: https://rapsinews.ru/digital_law_news/20240424/309839280.html (дата обращения: 29.03.2025).
4. Линников А. С. Экономические последствия расширения масштабов киберпреступности в России и мире // Банковское право. — 2017. — № 5. — С. 19—29.
5. Сбер: число звонков мошенников россиянам удалось уменьшить до 6—7 млн в сутки // URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/21775745 (дата обращения: 10.03.2025).
6. Ki Hong (Steve) Chon. Cybercrime Precursors: Towards a Model of Offender Resources // The Australian National University Journal. — 2018. — № 1. — P. 66—81.
Review
For citations:
Afanasieva O.R., Shiyan V.I. Cybercrime in the Regions of Russia: Current Trends and Preventive Measures. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(5):34-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.129.5.034-047