Regulation of Corporate ESG Reporting according to International Standards in BRICS Countries
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.127.3.036-044
Abstract
The article considers the problems of regulating corporate ESG reporting according to international standards in the BRICS countries. It defines the main international agreements and standards adopted on corporate ESG reporting issues, and analyzes the specifics and features of their implementation at the national legal level, as well as in the context of international cooperation. It considers the features and specifics of national legal regulation and interaction of the BRICS countries in the implementation of general principles of corporate ESG reporting in the context of the sustainable development agenda. The provisions of international and domestic national law are compared, a conclusion is made about the need to unify standards at the level of interstate cooperation of the BRICS countries, the formation of special interstate mechanisms for coordinating ESG reporting, the development of universal standards that take into account the specifics of the BRICS association.
About the Author
I. D. SobolevRussian Federation
Igor D. Sobolev, Associate Professor of the Chair of Private International Law, Cand. Sci. (Law)
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Горбунова Н. А. Корпоративная публичная отчетность: структура, виды, направления совершенствования // Управленческий учет. — 2022. — № 11. — Ч. 1. — С. 196—207.
2. Зенкина И. В. Комплексная оценка устойчивого развития как инструмент ответственного инвестирования // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. — 2023. — Т. 22. — Вып. 12. — С. 2270—2292.
3. Каталог рекомендаций по зеленой промышленности 2023 г. // Сайт Государственного комитета по развитию и реформам КНР. — URL: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/hdjl/yjzq/yjfk/lscyzdml2023/202304/t20230421_1353963.html (дата обращения: 08.01.2025).
4. Малиновская Н. В. Международные стандарты отчетности в области устойчивого развития: сравнительный анализ // Международный бухгалтерский учет. — 2022. — Т. 25. — Вып. 11. — С. 1206—1224.
5. Попова Т. Н. Концепция развития публичной нефинансовой отчетности и стандарт GRI (Глобальная инициатива по отчетности): перспективы применения в России // Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион: экономика, политика, право. — 2019. — № 1. — С. 72—78.
6. China stock exchanges mandate Sustainability Report — KPMG China // URL: https://kpmg.com/cn/en/home/insights/2024/04/china-stock-exchangesmandate-sustainability-report-for-larger-listed-entities.html (дата обращения: 08.01.2025).
7. Department of Social Development — Batho Pele // URL: https://www.dsd.gov.za/index.php/about/batho-pele (дата обращения: 09.01.2025).
8. The In Dubio pro Natura Principle: an Attempt of a Comprehensive Legal Reconstruction by Serena Baldin, Sara de Vido // URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/delivery.cfm/ssrn_id4313438_code4273178.pdf?abstractid=4313438&mirid=1 (дата обращения: 12.01.2025).
9. Promoting Social Responsibility through Ratings: China’s Corporate Social Credit System — U.S. — Asia Law Institute // URL: https://usali.org/asia-pacificsymposium-essays/promoting-social-responsibility-through-ratings-chinascorporate-social-credit-system (дата обращения: 08.01.2025).
10. Renu Gupta, Ameeta Motwani. ESG reporting in India: current scenario // Corporate Governance Insight. — Vol. 4. — Nо. 2. — December 2022. — P. 88—104. — URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366964022_esg_reporting_in_india_current_scenario (дата обращения: 12.01.2025).
11. Sustainable Development in China: Goals, China leads global efforts // URL: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sustainable-development-in-china/ (дата обращения: 08.01.2025).
12. South Africa’s Roadmap to ESG Reporting Preparedness in 2024 // URL: https://www.datatracks.com/za/blog/south-africas-roadmap-to-esg-reportingpreparedness-in-2024/ (дата обращения: 09.01.2025).
Review
For citations:
Sobolev I.D. Regulation of Corporate ESG Reporting according to International Standards in BRICS Countries. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;1(3):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.127.3.036-044