The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.175-180
Abstract
The text deals with the problem of defining the concept of “source of evidence” in the context of the use of electronic evidence in civil proce dure. The author notes that in the Russian science of civil procedure there is no clear definition of this concept yet. In foreign scientific works the source of electronic evidence is understood as a physical, analog or digital device capable of creating or storing information. However, in the author’s opinion, such a definition does not answer the question of what exactly the court needs to investigate. The author proposes to consider an electronic medium, such as a file or a web page, as the primary source of electronic evidence. This will allow to adapt the principle of immediacy to the modern conditions of consideration of civil and administrative cases. The text also raises the question of how exactly the court can examine electronic evidence. The author points out two ways: referring to the primary source or researching means of reproduction of evidence. A clear understanding of what exactly is the source of electronic evidence will allow to distinguish between these ways and develop rules for the study of electronic evidence.
About the Author
A. D. ErzinRussian Federation
Alexey D. ERZIN, Postgraduate student of the Shakaryan Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Гурвич М. А. Избранные труды. — Краснодар, 2006. — Т. 2. — 544 с.
2. Оконенко Р. И. «Электронные доказательства» и проблемы обеспечения прав граждан на защиту тайны личной жизни в уголовном процессе: сравнительный анализ законодательства Соединенных Штатов Америки и Российской Федерации : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. — М., 2016. — 158 с.
3. Советский гражданский процесс : учебник / под ред. М. А. Гурвича. — 2-е изд. — М. : Городец, 1975. — 399 с.
4. Тараненко В. Ф. Принципы арбитражного процесса и влияние советской процессуальной теории на их формирование : дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук: — М., 1983. — 356 c.
5. Треушников М. К. Творческие поиски в науке гражданского процессуального права. — М. : Городец, 2020. — 320 с.
6. Цифровая криминалистика : учебник для вузов — В. Б. Вехов [и др.] ; под ред. В. Б. Вехова, С. В. Зуева. — 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М. : Юрайт, 2024. — 490 с.
7. Эдельман Г. М. Принципы устности, непосредственности и непрерывности в советском гражданском процессуальном праве : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. — Свердловск, 1969. — 249 с.
8. Gorgieva D. & Gjorgjioska E. & Stoileva Z. Electronic evidence in civil proceedings // International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. — 2023. — P. 19—27.
9. Mason S., Seng D. [eds.]. Electronic Evidence. — 4th ed. — University of London, 2017. — 426 p.
10. Selfuk H. The actual role of the principle of immediacy in the Dutch criminal procedure : Master thesis. — 2012.
11. Tran Q. Electronic Evidence in Civil and Commercial Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Perspective of UNCITRAL, the European Union, Germany and Vietnam. — Springer Cham, 2022. — 295 p.
Review
For citations:
Erzin A.D. The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(2):174-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.175-180