Statement on the «Anti-search» Ban as a New Means of Protection in the National Legal Order
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.127-134
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The article is aimed at researching the legal nature of applying to the court for an injunction on initiating or continuing proceedings in a foreign court or arbitration (about an “anti-suit” injunction). The author has revealed that the direction of this application against the exercise of the right to go to court indicates its similarity with procedural and legal objections to the claim as a means of protecting the rights of the defendant. Through a compara tive analysis of these legal phenomena, the presence of such distinctive features list of applying to court in order to obtain an “anti-suit” injunction as the subject of filing an application, the time stage and procedure for filing it with a commercial court, the form and meaning of this application, as well as certain features of its consideration. The presence of these specific fea tures made it possible to formulate a conclusion about the transformation protective methods of defense in the national legal order and the formation of a completely new methodin their composition.
About the Author
V. I. GilmatoriaRussian Federation
Victoria I. GILMANOVA, Teacher of the Shakaryan Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Abramov S. N. Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess. - M. : Gosyurizdat, 1952. - 420 s.
2. Vasil'eva G. D. Zashchita otvetchika protiv iska v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. - Krasnoyarsk : Izdatel'stvo Krasnoyarskogo universiteta, 1982. - 108 s.
3. Ivanov E. I., Neznamov A. V. Zashchita lits, nakhodyashchikhsya pod ogranichitel'nymi merami: dogmaticheskoe issledovanie // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. - 2023. - № 4. - S. 7-11.
4. Neznamov A. V. Sudebnyi zapret v grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave: sravnitel'no-pravovoi aspekt : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. - Ekaterin burg, 2014. - 28 s.
5. Pyatiletov I. M. Zashchita interesov otvetchika v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse : uchebnoe posobie. - M. : VYuZI, 1990. - 85 s.
6. Rozhkova M. A. Obespechitel'nye mery inostrannogo suda // Ezh-Yurist. - 2006. - № 30 (Avgust). - S. 9-11.
7. Skvortsov O. Yu. Obespechitel'nye mery v vide zapreta provodit' treteiskoe razbiratel'stvo: popytka vnedreniya doktriny anti-suitinjunction ili nedorazumenie? // Treteiskii sud. - 2016. - № 2/3. - S. 87-106.
8. Khodykin R. M. Antiiskovye obespechitel'nye mery v tsivilisticheskom protsesse i mezhdunarodnom arbitrazhe // Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo, sravnitel'nogo i grazhdanskogo prava, mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: liberamicorum v chest' A. A. Kostina, O. N. Zimenkovoi, N. G. Eliseeva. - M., 2013. - S. 274-296.
9. Yudel'son K. S. Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess. - M. : Gosyurizdat, - 1956. - 439 s.
10. Yadykin A. I. Institut «antiiskovykh obespechitel'nykh mer» (anti-suitin junctions) i vozmozhnost' ego primeneniya rossiiskimi sudami v svyazi s osushchestvleniem treteiskogo razbiratel'stva // Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha : sbornik statei. - Vyp. 1 / pod red. A. V. Asoskova, N. G. Vilko voi, R. M. Khodykina. - M. : - Infotropik Media, 2013. - S. 220-268.
11. Yarkov V. V. Primenenie antiiskovykh obespechitel'nykh mer rossiiskimi sudami: pochemu by i net? // Zakon. - 2014. - № 8. - S. 84-92.
Review
For citations:
Gilmatoria V.I. Statement on the «Anti-search» Ban as a New Means of Protection in the National Legal Order. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(2):127-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.127-134
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)