Use of Information Technologies in Class Actions
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.071-081
Abstract
The article analyzes the issues of using information technologies in considering class actions. The application of technologies at the stage of group formation, conclusion settlement agreement, conclusion of an agreement of a group of persons, as well as replacement of the person conducting the case in the interests of a group of persons is considered. It is noted that the currently existing state automated systems GAS “Justice”, “My Arbitrator” need to be improved, since they do not provide for the possibility of performing key procedural actions within the framework of group proceedings, and do not contain information on the essence of the class action being considered in court, which deprives potential participants of the opportunity to decide on joining the class action. A conclusion is made on the need to create a single platform for class actions in the Russian Federation.
About the Author
O. V. Vatamanyuk
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL); Vatamanyuk & Partners Law Group
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav O. VATAMANYUK, Senior Lecturer of the Shakaryan Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Attorney at law, Managing Partner of Vatamanyuk & Partners Law Group, Cand. Sci. (Law)
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Ватаманюк В. О. Заключение мирового соглашения в групповом производстве иностранных государств // Российское право: образование, практика, наука. — 2021. — № 4. — С. 27—40.
2. Долганичев В. В. Возбуждение и подготовка дел группового производства. — М. : Статут, 2017. — 176 с.
3. Долганичев В. В. Информационные технологии при рассмотрении групповых исков // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. — 2022. — № 8. — С. 59—61.
4. Групповые иски: сложности и перспективы : колл. монография / под ред. В. Г. Домшенко. — М. : Статут, 2025. — 353 с.
5. Туманов Д. А. Групповые иски и общественные интересы (некоторые вопросы) // Закон. — 2021. — № 2. — С. 58—70.
6. Alexander J. C. An Introduction to Class Action Procedure in the United States. Debates over Group Litigation in Comparative Perspective. — 2000. — P. 1—26.
7. Andrews N. Multi-party proceedings in England: Representative and group actions. — 2011. — P. 1—15.
8. The Dynamism of Civil Procedure — Global Trends and Developments. — Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. — 283 p.
9. Hodges C. Collective Actions. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. — Oxford University press, 2010. — 1000 p.
10. Jolowicz J. A. On Civil Procedure. — Cambridge University press, 2000. — 444 p.
11. Lindblom P. H. Group litigation in Scandinavia. ERA Forum // Journal of the Academy of European Law. — Vol. 10. — 2009. — No. 2. — P. 7—35.
12. Nagy C. I. Collective Actions in Europe. A Comparative, Economic and Transsystemic Analysis. — SpringerBriefs in Law, 2019. — 131 p.
13. Transformation of Civil Justice Unity and Diversity. — Springer, 2018. — 420 p.
14. Van Lith H. The Dutch Collective Settlements Act and Private International Law. Erasmus school of law. — Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2010. — 151 p.
15. Zekoll J. Comparative Civil Procedure. — The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, 2019. — 1424 p.
Review
For citations:
Vatamanyuk O.V. Use of Information Technologies in Class Actions. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2025;(2):71-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.071-081
Views:
56
Email this article 
