Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Law Heritage in the Communicative Dimension

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.124.12.112-120

Abstract

The article is devoted to the philosophical and legal study of the category of “law heritage” as a complex multi-vector concept. The article highlights the normative array, legal practice, scientific legal concepts and unofficial law texts of previous periods of development of the national law system, which have developed historically and have passed the test of time and explicate the attitude to social and official law of various social groups and (or) society as a whole, as objects of law heritage. The significance of law heritage in law existence is determined by its features: continuity, unity, normativity, sociality. The main attention in the article is paid to the study of the construction and existence of law heritage in the communicative dimension. Based on the analysis of the ontological, phenomenological and axiological aspects of this category, it is concluded that law heritage acts as a valuebased means of consolidating law knowledge, explicating the community’s ideas about law norms and values within the space-time continuum, which have been tested in practice, demonstrating their effectiveness in ensuring law and order, and the use of which in lawmaking and (or) law enforcement can ensure the harmonization of modern law reality.

About the Author

A. V. Skorobogatov
Kazan Innovation University named after V. G. Timiryasov
Russian Federation

Andrey V. SKOROBOGATOV, Professor, Department of Theory of State and Law and Public Legal Disciplines, Dr. Sci. (History), Associate Professor



References

1. Бабурин С. Н. Цивилизационные и геополитические основания продолжения конституционной реформы в Российской Федерации // Правовая мысль. — 2021. — № 1 (2). — С. 16—21.

2. Исаев И. А. Основная норма («Скрижали революционного закона») // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 8. — С. 20—33.

3. Румянцева В. Г. «Власть должна быть ограничена правом во имя справедливости» // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2021. — № 6. — С. 207—209.

4. Рыбаков В. А. Преемственность и рецепция — способы развития национального права // Юридическая техника. — 2011. — № 5. — С. 19—25.

5. Софронова С. А. Объекты правового наследия и их значение в условиях развития современных правовых систем // Вестник института: преступление, наказание, исправление. — 2008. — № 2. — С. 76—78.

6. Clippele M. S. de. Does the Law Determine What Heritage to Remember? // International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique. — 2021. — Vol. 34. — P. 623—656.

7. Konsa K. Heritage as a Socio-Cultural Construct: Problems of Definition // Baltic Journal of Art History. — 2013. — Vol. 6. — P. 123—149.

8. Mulcahy L. Eyes of the Law: A Visual Turn in Socio-Legal Studies? // Journal of Law and Society. — 2017. — Vol. 44. — P. S111—S128.


Review

For citations:


Skorobogatov A.V. Law Heritage in the Communicative Dimension. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2024;1(12):112-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.124.12.112-120

Views: 43


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)