The Linguistic Unity and National Identity: A Legal Retrospective
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.124.12.101-111
Abstract
The author provides a retrospective analysis of the legal aspects of language policy during the modern era, when national identity, largely based on a common language, becomes intertwined with civic identity, which demands unconditional political loyalty to the state. Under these conditions, the modern state, regardless of its form of government, political structure, or regime, attempts to unify diverse groups — ethnic and otherwise — into a political nation primarily integrated linguistically, through language policy and the legal regulation that mediates its implementation. The paper shows the central role that linguistic ideologies and language regulation played in the formation of civic identity and the political nation mediating respectively the ideological-value and positive-legal aspects of language policy. It is shown how the progressively increasing politicization of language issues was accompanied — within the context of state-building processes and the formation of civic identity — by the legal framing of this discourse. The article proves the irrelevance of the point of view of radical constructivism regarding the relationship between language, national identity and legal regulation. The final conclusion emphasizes the importance of comparative-historical study of the experience of legal influence on the linguistic sphere as a key component of national identity for determining optimal forms of legal impact on language relations.
About the Author
A. S. KartsovRussian Federation
Alexey S. KARTSOV, Advisor, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; Professor, Department of Theory and History, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor
References
1. Андерсон Б. Воображаемые сообщества. Размышления об истоках и распространении национализма. — М. : Кучково поле, 2016. — 416 с.
2. Веденеев Ю. А. Юридическая наука: становление и развитие языка научной дисциплины // Гражданин. Выборы. Власть. — 2024. — № 1. — С. 47—72.
3. Геллнер Э. Нации и национализм. — М. : Прогресс, 1991. — 322 с.
4. Исаев И. А. Историческая метафизика власти и закона. Обращение к истокам. Очерки по истории и философии права. — М. : Проспект, 2024. — 272 с.
5. Исаев И. А. Основная норма («Скрижали революционного закона») // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 8. — С. 2—33.
6. Культуральные исследования права / под общ. ред. И. Л. Честнова, Е. Н. Тонкова. — СПб. : Алетейя, 2017. — 467 с.
7. Миллер А. И. Империя Романовых и национализм: эссе по методологии исторического исследования. — М. : Новое литературное обозрение, 2010. — 320 с.
8. Хобсбаум Э. Нации и национализм после 1780 года. — СПб. : Алетейя, 1998. — 308 с.
9. Языковая политика, конфликты и согласие / отв. ред. С. В. Соколовский, Е. И. Филиппова. — М. : ИЭА РАН, 2018. — 334 с.
10. Barbour S. Language and National Identity in Europe // C. Hoffmann (ed.). Language, Culture and Communication in Contemporary Europe. — Clevedon : Multilingual Matters, 1996, — P. 28—46.
11. Bauman R., Briggs L. Language Philosophy as Language Ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder // P. Kroskrity (ed.). Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. — Santa Fe, 2000. — P. 139—204.
12. Berre M. Le Français a l’ecole primaire en Flandre vers 1880—1890: Identites nationales et techniques d’enseignement // М. Kok-Escalle, F. Melka (eds.). Changements politiques et statut des langues: Histoire et epistemologie 1780— 1945. — Amsterdom : Rodopi, 2001. — P. 235—252.
13. Bivona R. L’Italie est faite, il faut faire les Italiens: La Construction de l’identite nationale dans les manuels scolaires // М. Kok-Escalle, F. Melka (eds.). Changements politiques et statut des langues: Histoire et epistemologie 1780— 1945. — Amsterdom : Rodopi, 2001. — P. 215—233.
14. Blommaert J., Verschueren J. The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. // K. Woolard K., P. Kroskrity (eds.) Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. — New York, 1998. — P. 189—210.
15. Edwards J. Language and Identity: An introduction. — Cambridge, 2009. — 314 p.
16. Gal S. Linguistic Theories and National Images in Nineteenth-century Hungary // S. Gal, K. Woolard (eds.). Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority. — Manchester : St. Jerome, 2001 — P. 30—45.
17. Gorlach M. Language and Nation: the Concept of Linguistic Identity in the History of English // English World-Wide: a Journal of Varieties of English. — 1997. — № 18 — P. 1—34.
18. Greenfield L. Nationalism and language // Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. — London, 1998. — P. 635—641.
19. Gumperz J. Introduction: Language and the Communication of Social Identity // J. Gumperz (ed.). Language and Social Identity. — Cambridge : Cambridge University press, 1982. — P. 1—21.
20. Jensen J. Politics of Language and Language of Politics: Corsican Language Activism and Conflicts between Internal and External Representations of National Identity // Journal of the Danish Ethnographic Society. — 1999. — Vol. 41. — P. 77—98.
21. Kamusella, T. Language as an Instrument of Nationalism in Central Europe // Nations and Nationalism. — 2001. — № 7. — P. 235—251.
22. Kuter L. Breton vs. French: Language and the Opposition of Political, Economic, Social, and Cultural Values // N. Dorian (ed.). Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1992. — P. 75—89.
23. Mersin-Alici D. The Role of Culture, History and Language in Turkish National Identity Building: an Overemphasis on Central Asian Roots // Central Asian Survey. — 1996. — № 15. — P. 217—231.
24. Nelde P., Weber P. Les trois identites linguistiques en Belgique — des particularismes culturels? // Sociolinguistica. — 1995. — № 9. — P. 88—95.
25. Paulston C. B. Language Policies and Language Rights // Annual Review of Anthropology. — 1997. — Vol. 26. — P. 73—85.
26. Renan E. Qu’est-ce qu’une nation? // E. Renan. Discours et conférences. — Paris : Galmann Lévy, 1887. — P. 311—340.
27. Rohfleisch I. Das Dilemma der nationalen Identitat in Oberschlesien // D. Szilvia, F. Thorsten (hrsg.). Einstellungsforschung in der Soziolinguistik und Nachbardisziplinen / Studies in Language Attitudes. — Frankfurt : Peter Lang, 2000. — S. 99—108.
28. Sayer D. The Language of Nationality and the Nationality of Language: Prague 1780—1920 // Past and Present. — 1996. — Vol. 153. Nov. — P. 164—210.
29. Stevenson P. The German Language and the Construction of National Identities // J. Flood, P. Salmon (hrsg.). Das unsichtbare Band der Sprache: Studies in German Language and Linguistic History in Memory of Leslie Seiffert. — Stuttgart : Heinz Akademischer, 1993. — S. 333—356.
30. Stubkjaer F. Die Standardaussprache des osterreichischen Deutsch im Konzept Deutsch als plurizentrische Sprache // Jahrbuch Deutsch als Fremd- sprache: Intercultural German Studies. — 1997. — № 23. — S. 187—207.
31. Tsui A., Tollefson J. Language Policy and the Construction of National Cultural Identity // Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts. — New York : Routledge, 2017. — P. 1—21.
32. Turville-Petre T. England the Nation: Language, Literature, and National Identity, 1290—1340. — Oxford : Clarendon press, 1996. — 241 p.
33. Woolard K. Language variation and cultural hegemony: toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory // American Ethnologist. — 1985. —№ 12. — P. 738—748.
34. Woolard K. The Politics of Language Status Planning: ‘Normalization’ in Catalonia // N. Schweda-Nicholson (ed.). Language in the International Perspective. — Norwood : Ablex, 1986. — P. 91—102.
Review
For citations:
Kartsov A.S. The Linguistic Unity and National Identity: A Legal Retrospective. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2024;1(12):101-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.124.12.101-111