Disputes from a Cross-Border Contract with a Chinese Contractor: Features of Recognition and Implementation of Decisions
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.098-107
Abstract
This article analyzes the risks that may arise for Russian companies in the event of applying to the state courts of the Russian Federation or China, or choosing an arbitration method for resolving a dispute with Chinese partners. The features of the recognition and enforcement of the decision in the PRC and the Russian Federation are determined.
In this work, it was found that when concluding a cross-border contract with Chinese counterparties, it is necessary to adhere to the following rules: in order to avoid difficulties an arbitration clause should be written with the consolidation of one of the well-known Chinese institutional arbitration centers; if the counterparties do not want to consider the dispute in arbitration, it can be advised to fix the prorogation clause on the resolution of the dispute in the Chinese state court, since the Russian courts are more willing to recognize the decisions of the courts of the PRC.
About the Author
Ya. O. Alimova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yana O. Alimova, Associate Professor of the Chair of Private International Law, Chief of Legal Moot Department, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Баташвили В. Арбитражная оговорка в международных сделках. Какой суд выбрать? // Корпоративный юрист. — 2018. — № 5.
2. Вараксин М. Восток — дело тонкое: где судиться с китайской компанией // URL: https://pravo.ru/story/243846/ (дата обращения: 17.06.2023).
3. Воробьев Ю., Даутов К. Споры с китайскими контрагентами: как правильно выбрать суд? // Международные банковские операции. — 2017. — № 3 (65). — С. 70—74.
4. Отчет ФТС «Внешняя торговля Российской Федерации по основным странам и группам стран» // URL: https://customs.gov.ru/folder/511 (дата обращения: 05.06.2023).
5. Правовые основы бизнеса в Китае / отв. ред. А. Е. Молотников, В. Шань. — М. : Издательство РКЮО, 2018. —572 с.
6. Практика МКАС при ТПП РФ: 2004—2016. К 85-летию МКАС (на основе анонимизированных материалов из журналов «Международный коммерческий арбитраж» и «Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража») / науч. ред. и сост. А. Н. Жильцов, А. И. Муранов ; предисл. А. С. Комаров. — М., 2017. — 1565 с.
7. Guodong Du, Meng Yu. Chinese Court Recognizes and Enforces a Russian Court Judgment in 2018 // URL: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-courtrecognizes-and-enforces-a-russian-court-judgment-in-december-2018 (дата обращения: 10.06.2023).
8. Meng Yu. List of China’s Bilateral Treaties on Judicial Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters (Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Included) // URL: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/list-of-chinas-bilateral-treaties-onjudicialassistance-in-civil-and-commercial-matters (дата обращения: 10.06.2023).
Review
For citations:
Alimova Ya.O. Disputes from a Cross-Border Contract with a Chinese Contractor: Features of Recognition and Implementation of Decisions. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;(9):98-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.098-107
Views:
343
Email this article 
