Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

The origins of the concept of corporate control in foreign and Russian science

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.108.8.199-207

Abstract

The concept of corporate control depends on the scope of application. For instance, an economist may reveal corporate control through the economic power over the corporation, and a lawyer through corporate rights. At the same time, the legal doctrine has not developed a dominant approach to the definition of corporate control. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the origins of the doctrine of corporate control in foreign and Russian science. The author in the article summarizes the key positions of scientists on the issue under discussion and identifies the difference between the domestic approach and Western legal systems

About the Author

A. S. Oborov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr S. Oborov - Deputy Director of the Business Law Institute (MSAL), Degree-seeking student of the Entrepreneurial Law Department of the Law Faculty Lomonosov MSU.

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Аджемоглу Д., Робинсон Дж. А. Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные. Происхождение власти, процветания и нищеты: пер. с англ. — М. : АСТ, 2022. — 672 с.

2. Гуриев С. М. Мифы экономики. Заблуждения и стереотипы, которые распространяют СМИ и политики. — 9-е изд. — М. : Манн, Иванов и Фарбер, 2022. — 320 с.

3. Капелюшников Р. И. Экономические очерки: методология, институты, человеческий капитал : сборник научных трудов. — М. : ИД ВШЭ, 2016. — 574 с.

4. Корпоративное право : учебный курс : в 2 т. / Е. Г. Афанасьева, В. А. Вайпан, Е. п. Губин [и др.] ; отв. ред. И. С. Шиткина. — М. : Статут, 2018. — Т. 2. — 990 с.

5. Сарбаш С. В. Восстановление корпоративного контроля // Вестник гражданского права. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 70—79.

6. Суханов Е. А. Сравнительное корпоративное право. — М. : Статут, 2014. — 456 с.

7. Чупрунов И. С. Иск по п. 3 ст. 65.2 ГК v. восстановление корпоративного контроля // Цивилистика. — 2022. — Т. 1. — № 2. — С. 52—81.

8. Adolf A. Berle, Gardiner C. Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. — N.Y., 1933. — 396 p.

9. Andenas Mads Toennesson and Frank Wooldridge. European comparative company law. — Cambridge : Cambridge univ. press, 2009. — 561 p.

10. Bernard S. Black, Reinier Kraakman, Anna Tarassova. Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? // 52 Stanford Law Review 1731—1808 (2000). — URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=181348.

11. Coffee John C. Dispersed Ownership: The Theories, the Evidence, and the Enduring Tension Between «Lumpers» and «Splitters» (February 2, 2010) // Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper № 363. — URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1532922.

12. Janet Dine, Marios Koutsias. Company Law. — 8th ed. — Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. — 304 p.

13. Klaus J. Hopt. Takeover Defenses in Europe: A Comparative, Theoretical and Policy Analysis // Columbia Journal of European Law. — Vol. 20.2 (2014). — URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2540512.

14. Kraakman J., Armour P., Davies L., Enriques H., Hansmann G., Hertig K., Hopt H., Kanda M., Pargendler W.-G., Ringle en E. Rock. The Anatomy of Corporate Law. A Comparative and Functional Approach. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017. — 281 p.

15. La Porta Rafael and Lopez de Silanes Florencio and Shleifer Andrei. Corporate Ownership Around the World (August 1998) // Harvard Institute of Economic Research Paper № 1840. — URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=103130.

16. Manne H. G. Mergers and the market for Corporate Control // The Journal of Political Economy. — 1965. — Vol. 73. — № 2. — P. 110—120.

17. Okanigbuan F. Corporate Takeover Law and Management Discipline. — Routledge, 2020. — 218 p.

18. Rajan Raghuram G. and Zingales Luigi. The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the 20th Century (June 2001). — URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=236100.

19. Roe Mark J. Political Preconditions to Separating Ownership from Corporate Control // Stanford Law Review. — 2000. — Vol. 53. — P. 539. — URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=165143.

20. Roe Mark J. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance. — Princeton University Press, 1994. — URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2310710.

21. Zohar Goshen and Asaf Hamdani. Majority Control and Minority Protection / The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance. — Oxford University Press, 2018. — P. 449—469.


Review

For citations:


Oborov A.S. The origins of the concept of corporate control in foreign and Russian science. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;(8):199-207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.108.8.199-207

Views: 276


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)