Preview

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))

Advanced search

Prospects for the Development of Legislative Activities Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.91.3.081-088

Abstract

In the article, on the basis of changes in the normative regulation of the law-making activities of the prosecutor’s office, the trend of expanding the practice of initiative development of bills by the prosecutor’s office is analyzed. Possible negative aspects of this trend are predicted. One of them is that, exercising the right of legislative initiative, the prosecutors of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation may call into question their independence, objectivity and impartiality in the future supervision over the implementation of the law adopted on their initiative. The negative aspect of this trend is that it can lead to the diversion of the already limited human resources of the prosecutor’s office from solving their key tasks. The professional qualities necessary for specialists to carry out legislative work are highlighted. It is noted, in particular, the need for a high level of qualification of these specialists in those areas and areas of public relations that are included in the subject of regulation of the bill being developed. The correlation between the legislative activity of the prosecutor’s office and the implementation of the principle of non-interference in the operational and economic activities of supervised objects in the prosecutor’s activity is analyzed.

About the Author

S. V. Perov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

S. V. PEROV, Associate Professor of the Chair of the organization of the judiciaryand prosecutorial and investigative activities, Director of the Institute of the prosecutor’s office, Cand. Sсi. (Law), Associate Professor 

9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Арзамасов Ю. Г. Эффективность законодательства: постановка проблемы, основные пути решения // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). — 2018. — № 4. — С. 125—135.

2. Березовская С. Г. Прокурорский надзор в советском государственном управлении (общий надзор). — М., 1954. — 108 с.

3. Ергашев Е. Р. Принципы прокурорского надзорно-охранительного права и его институтов : дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук. — Екатеринбург, 2008. — 311 с.

4. Перов С. В. Контрольно-надзорные и регуляторные функции федеральных органов исполнительной власти: проблемы разграничения в контексте административной реформы // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 2 (147). — С. 69—80.

5. Черепанов М. М., Пугачев А. В. Принцип невмешательства органов прокуратуры в оперативно-хозяйственную деятельность поднадзорных субъектов // Электронное приложение к «Российскому юридическому журналу». — 2017. — № 1. — С. 91—104.

6. Шалумов М. С. Проблемы функционирования российской прокуратуры в условиях формирования демократического правового государства : автореф. дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук. — Екатеринбург, 2002. — 50 с.


Review

For citations:


Perov S.V. Prospects for the Development of Legislative Activities Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2022;(3):81-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.91.3.081-088

Views: 203


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-5998 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6163 (Online)