What is Language and Law? And does anyone care?

1. Ainsworth, Janet. 1993. In a different register: The pragmatics of powerlessness in police interrogation. Yale Law Journal 103: 259.

2. Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The bilingual courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

3. Bhatia, V. K., Christopher N. Candlin, Jan Engberg, and Anna Trosborg. 2003. Multilingual and multicultural contexts of legislation: An international perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.

4. Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, language, and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

5. Bodde, Derk, and Clarence Morris. 1973. Law in imperial China. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

6. Bowers, Frederick. 1989. Linguistic aspects of legislative expression. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

7. Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr. 1990. Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

8. Corcos, Christine Alice. 2000. An international guide to law and literature. Buffalo, N.Y.: William S. Hein & Co.

9. Cotterill, Janet. 2003. Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Houndmills: Palgrave.

10. Coulthard, Malcolm. 2002. Whose voice is it?: Invented and concealed dialogue in written records of verbal evidence produced by the police. Language in the legal process 19 (Janet Cotterill ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave.

11. Eades, Diana. 2005. Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics 26:503—526.

12. Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent.

13. What is language and law? And does anyone care? 35 London: Routledge.

14. Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham: Duke University Press.

15. Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

16. Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: Macmillan.

17. Greenawalt, Kent. 1989. Speech, crime, and the uses of language. Oxford: University Press.

18. Grice, H. P. 1989. Logic and conversation. Studies in the way of words, 22- 40. Harvard: University Press.

19. Haiman, Franklyn S. 1993. “Speech acts” and the First Amendment. Chicago: University Press.

20. Jackson, Bernard S. 1985. Semiotics and legal theory. London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.

21. Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is hereby performed: Legal speech acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

22. Levi, Judith. 1994. Language and the law: A bibliographic guide to social science research in the U.S. A. Chicago: American Bar Association.

23. Matoesian, Gregory. 2001. Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: University Press.

24. Megarry, R. E. 1958. Miscellany-at-law: A diversion for lawyers and others. London: Stevens and Sons.

25. Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The language of the law. London: Little, Brown & Co.

26. Miller, Geoffrey P. 1990. Pragmatics and the maxims of interpretation. Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1179.

27. Plato. 1926. Plato in twelve volumes, XI, Laws, vol. 2 (R. G. Bury trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

28. Posner, Richard. 1988. Law and literature: A misunderstood relation. Harvard: University Press.

29. Quinn, Susan. 2000. From orality to literacy in medieval Iceland. Old Icelandic literature and society 30 (Margaret Clunies Ross ed.). Cambridge: University Press.

30. Sarat, Austin, and Thomas B. Kearns (eds.). 1994. The rhetoric of law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

31. Shuy, Roger. 1993. Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell.

32. Sinclair, M. B. W. 1985. Law and language: The role of pragmatics in statutory interpretation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46: 373.

33. Solan, Lawrence M. 1993. The language of judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34. Solan, Lawrence M. 1998. Law, language, and lenity. William & Mary Law Review 40:57.

35. Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter Tiersma. 2005. Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University Press.

36. Stygall, Gail. 1994. Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

37. Texas Law Abstract. 1982. Symposium: Law and literature. University of Texas Law Review 60: 373—586.

38. Tiersma, Peter. 1993. Nonverbal communication and the freedom of “speech.” Wisconsin Law Review 1993: 1525—1589.

39. Tiersma, Peter. 1999. Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

40. Tiersma, Peter. 2005. The new Black’s. Journal of Legal Education 55:386.

41. Tiersma, Peter. 2006. Toward more understandable jury instructions. Criminal Justice 21:4.

42. What is language and law? And does anyone care? 37.

43. VerSteeg, Russ. 2000. Early Mesopotamian law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

44. Winter, Steven L. A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

45. Wydick, Richard. 1994. Plain English for lawyers (third edition). Durham : Carolina Academic Press.