vestnik-msalВестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))2311-59982782-6163Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)10.17803/2311-5998.2018.45.5.146-152vestnik-msal-502Research ArticleОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНАЯ СРЕДАРежим взаимного признания профессиональных квалификаций как основа эффективности осуществления трудовой и академической мобильности граждан Европейского СоюзаTHE REGIME OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AS THE BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF LABOR AND ACADEMIC MOBILITY OF EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSЗаплатинаТ. С.ZaplatinaT. S.tatianazaplatina@yandexУниверситет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)20181203202005146152Copyright © Заплатина Т.С., 20202020Заплатина Т.С.Zaplatina T.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.msal.ru/jour/article/view/502

Статья посвящена анализу роли режима взаимного признания профессиональных квалификаций для целей трудовой и академической мобильности. Понятие режим рассматривалось в европейской доктрине как ключевой механизм управления, в том числе процессом профессионального признания. Признание как процесс координации осуществляется в определенном режиме. В нормативных актах Европейского Союза предусмотрено несколько режимов взаимного признания, отличающихся степенью гармонизации положений регулируемой области. В Европейском Союзе установлены неавтоматический и автоматический режимы профессионального признания, установленные общим и специальными актами для целей трудовой мобильности. Режим академического признания для образовательной мобильности установлен Лиссабонской конвенцией, принятой в рамках Совета Европы. Рассмотренные режимы взаимного признания профессиональных квалификаций позволяют установить общие для его государств-членов требования, облегчающие трудовую и академическую мобильность граждан ЕС.

The article is devoted to the analysis of the role of the regime of mutual recognition of professional qualifications for the purposes of labor and academic mobility. The concept of regime was considered in the European doctrine as a key management mechanism including the process of professional recognition. Recognition as a process of coordination works in a certain regime. There are several modes of mutual recognition regimes in the European Union legislation depending the harmonization of the regulated area provisions. There are non-automatic and automatic regimes of mutual recognition of professional qualifications in the European Union for the purposes of labor mobility. These are established by general and special acts of the European Union. The regime of academic recognition for educational mobility is established by the Lisbon Convention, adopted within the framework of the Council of Europe. The analyzed regimes of mutual recognition of professional qualifications make it possible to establish common requirements for its member states. These common requirements facilitate the labor and academic mobility of EU citizens.

Европейский Союзвзаимное признание профессиональных квалификацийакадемическое признаниережимавтоматический режимобщий режимспециальные режимыEuropean Unionmutual recognition of professional qualificationsacademic recognitionregimeautomatic regimegeneral regimespecial regimesReferencesNicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government // Law and Contemporary Problems. 2005. Vol. 68. Iss. 3/4. P. 263.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government // Law and Contemporary Problems. 2005. Vol. 68. Iss. 3/4. P. 263.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Op. cit. P. 264.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Op. cit. P. 264.Ballegooij W. van. The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European law. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland : Intersentia, 2015. P. 8.Ballegooij W. van. The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European law. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland : Intersentia, 2015. P. 8.Ballegooij W. van. Op. cit. P. 265.Ballegooij W. van. Op. cit. P. 265.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Op. cit. P. 265Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Op. cit. P. 265Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part // OJ L 29, 04.02.2016. P. 3-150 (соглашение еще не вступило в силу).Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part // OJ L 29, 04.02.2016. P. 3-150 (соглашение еще не вступило в силу).Free trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part // OJ L 127, 14.05.2011. P. 6-1343.Free trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part // OJ L 127, 14.05.2011. P. 6-1343.Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) of 21 september 2017 // URL: http:// www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ ceta-aecg/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng (дата обращения: 05.04.2018).Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) of 21 september 2017 // URL: http:// www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ ceta-aecg/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng (дата обращения: 05.04.2018).Schmidt S. K. Mutual Recognition as a new mode of governance // Journal of European Public Policy. 2007. Vol. 14. Iss. 5. P 670-675.Schmidt S. K. Mutual Recognition as a new mode of governance // Journal of European Public Policy. 2007. Vol. 14. Iss. 5. P 670-675.Schmidt S. K. Op. cit. P. 670-675.Schmidt S. K. Op. cit. P. 670-675.Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications // OJ L 255, 30.09.2005. P. 22-142.Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications // OJ L 255, 30.09.2005. P. 22-142.Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) № 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (the IMI Regulation) // OJ L 354, 28.12.2013. P. 132-170.Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) № 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (the IMI Regulation) // OJ L 354, 28.12.2013. P. 132-170.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2000. Case C-238/98. Hugo Fernando Hocsman v Ministre de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité // ECLI:EU:C:2000:440.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2000. Case C-238/98. Hugo Fernando Hocsman v Ministre de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité // ECLI:EU:C:2000:440.Judgment of the Court of 7 May 1991. Case C-340/89. Irène Vlassopoulou v Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg // ECLI:EU:C:1991:193.Judgment of the Court of 7 May 1991. Case C-340/89. Irène Vlassopoulou v Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg // ECLI:EU:C:1991:193.Judgment of the Court of 9 February 1994. Case C-319/92. Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein // ECLI:EU:C:1994:47. Par. 16.Judgment of the Court of 9 February 1994. Case C-319/92. Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein // ECLI:EU:C:1994:47. Par. 16.Directive (EU) 2017/2397 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on the recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation and repealing Council Directives 91/672/EEC and 96/50/EC // OJ L 345, 27. 12.2017. P. 53-86.Directive (EU) 2017/2397 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on the recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation and repealing Council Directives 91/672/EEC and 96/50/EC // OJ L 345, 27. 12.2017. P. 53-86.Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained // OJ L 77, 14.3.1998. P. 36-43Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained // OJ L 77, 14.3.1998. P. 36-43Regulation (EC) № 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October ^ 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the б occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC // OJ L 300, А 14.11.2009. P. 51-71Regulation (EC) № 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October ^ 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the б occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC // OJ L 300, А 14.11.2009. P. 51-71Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statu- А tory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/ Т EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC // OJ L 157, 09.06.2006. Л P. 87-107Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statu- А tory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/ Т EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC // OJ L 157, 09.06.2006. Л P. 87-107Четвериков А. О. Право Совета Европы и Болонский процесс // Актуальные проблемы российского права. - 2016. - № 2 (63). - C. 79-91.Четвериков А. О. Право Совета Европы и Болонский процесс // Актуальные проблемы российского права. - 2016. - № 2 (63). - C. 79-91.Ballegooij W. van. The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European law. - Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland : Intersentia, 2015. - 399 p.Ballegooij W. van. The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European law. - Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland : Intersentia, 2015. - 399 p.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government // Law and Contemporary Problems. - 2005. - Vol. 68. - Issue 3/4. - P. 263-317.Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government // Law and Contemporary Problems. - 2005. - Vol. 68. - Issue 3/4. - P. 263-317.Schmidt S. K. Mutual Recognition as a new mode of governance // Journal of European Public Policy. - 2007. - Vol. 14. - Iss. 5. - P. 667-825.Schmidt S. K. Mutual Recognition as a new mode of governance // Journal of European Public Policy. - 2007. - Vol. 14. - Iss. 5. - P. 667-825.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.