<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vestnik-msal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2311-5998</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-6163</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2311-5998.2017.34.6.083-092</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vestnik-msal-150</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЗАРУБЕЖНЫЙ ОПЫТ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>FOREIGN EXPERIENCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К вопросу о защите прав на товарные знаки в Интернете: зарубежный опыт</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>TO THE QUESTION OF THE PROTECTION OF TRADEMARK RIGHTS ON THE INTERNET: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кодиров</surname><given-names>Ш. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kodirov</surname><given-names>Sh. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">odiroff@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>83</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кодиров Ш.Б., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кодиров Ш.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kodirov S.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.msal.ru/jour/article/view/150">https://vestnik.msal.ru/jour/article/view/150</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена анализу судебной практики иностранных государств, связанной с нарушением прав на товарные знаки в Интернете, при этом особое внимание уделяется наиболее актуальным проблемам, возникающим в связи с данными правонарушениями.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article analyzes the court practice of foreign countries related to the infringement of trademark rights on the Internet, at the same time, special attention is paid to the most topical problems arising in connection with these offences.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>товарный знак</kwd><kwd>Интернет</kwd><kwd>ВОИС</kwd><kwd>функции товарного знака</kwd><kwd>коммерция</kwd><kwd>интернет-посредники</kwd><kwd>контекстная реклама</kwd><kwd>интернет-аукционы</kwd><kwd>основная и субсидиарная ответственность</kwd><kwd>глубинное связывание</kwd><kwd>обрамление</kwd><kwd>всплывающие окна с рекламой</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>«мышеловка»</kwd><kwd>trademark</kwd><kwd>Internet</kwd><kwd>WIPO</kwd><kwd>trademark functions</kwd><kwd>commerce</kwd><kwd>Internet intermediaries</kwd><kwd>contextual advertising</kwd><kwd>Internet auctions</kwd><kwd>basic and subsidiary responsibility</kwd><kwd>deep linking</kwd><kwd>framing</kwd><kwd>pop-up ads</kwd><kwd>mousetrapping</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дашян М.С. Право информационных магистралей: вопросы правового регулирования в сфере Интернет. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2007. С. 19</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дашян М.С. Право информационных магистралей: вопросы правового регулирования в сфере Интернет. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2007. С. 19</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">КурбалийяЙ. Управление Интернетом. М., 2010. С. 34-35</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">КурбалийяЙ. Управление Интернетом. М., 2010. С. 34-35</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Незнамов А. В. Особенности компетенции по рассмотрению интернет-споров: национальный и международный аспекты: автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. Екатеринбург, 2010. С. 16-17</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Незнамов А. В. Особенности компетенции по рассмотрению интернет-споров: национальный и международный аспекты: автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. Екатеринбург, 2010. С. 16-17</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Наумов В.Б. Право и Интернет: Очерки теории и практики. М.: Книжный дом «Университет», 2002. С. 12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Наумов В.Б. Право и Интернет: Очерки теории и практики. М.: Книжный дом «Университет», 2002. С. 12</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Marks, and Other Industrial Property Rights in Signs, on the Internet // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/ mdocs/govbody/en/a_36/a_36_8.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Marks, and Other Industrial Property Rights in Signs, on the Internet // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/ mdocs/govbody/en/a_36/a_36_8.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joint Resolution Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/a_34/a_34_13.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joint Resolution Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/a_34/a_34_13.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Promatek Industries Ltd. v. Equitrac Corp. // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case294.cfm (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Promatek Industries Ltd. v. Equitrac Corp. // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case294.cfm (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Australian Gold, Inc. v. Hatfield 436 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2006) // Find-Law, a Thomson Reuters business, 2017. URL: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-10th-circuit/1489836.html (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Australian Gold, Inc. v. Hatfield 436 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2006) // Find-Law, a Thomson Reuters business, 2017. URL: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-10th-circuit/1489836.html (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp. 354 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir., Jan. 14, 2004) // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case336.cfm (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp. 354 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir., Jan. 14, 2004) // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case336.cfm (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Google France SARL and Google Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA (C-236/08); Google France SARL v. Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL (C-237/08); Google France SARL v. Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others (C-238/08).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Google France SARL and Google Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA (C-236/08); Google France SARL v. Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL (C-237/08); Google France SARL v. Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others (C-238/08).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 23 March 2010 // CVRIA, 2017. URL: http://curia. europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=83961&amp;doclang=en (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 23 March 2010 // CVRIA, 2017. URL: http://curia. europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=83961&amp;doclang=en (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/ wipolex/ru/text.jsp?file_id=181678 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/ wipolex/ru/text.jsp?file_id=181678 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 562 F. 3d 123 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2009 // Google Scholar,2017. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5425188118461692354 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 562 F. 3d 123 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2009 // Google Scholar,2017. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5425188118461692354 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc., 730 F. Supp. 2d 531 (2010) // Google Scholar, 2017. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17990940966060376496&amp;hl=en&amp;as_ sdt=6&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc., 730 F. Supp. 2d 531 (2010) // Google Scholar, 2017. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17990940966060376496&amp;hl=en&amp;as_ sdt=6&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr (дата обращения: 21.03.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вагнер М. Ticketmaster обвиняет Microsoft в незаконной связи со своим узлом Web // Computerworld Россия, 2017. URL: http://www.osp.ru/cw/1997/19/20411/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Вагнер М. Ticketmaster обвиняет Microsoft в незаконной связи со своим узлом Web // Computerworld Россия, 2017. URL: http://www.osp.ru/cw/1997/19/20411/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Washington Post v. Total News, Inc (см.: Gomez F. C. Washington Post v. Total News, Inc. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 1998. Vol. 13:21. P. 21-34)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Washington Post v. Total News, Inc (см.: Gomez F. C. Washington Post v. Total News, Inc. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 1998. Vol. 13:21. P. 21-34)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Company, LLC, et al. v. The Gator Corporation C.A. No. 02-909-A (E.D. Va., July 12, 2002) // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case286. cfm (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Company, LLC, et al. v. The Gator Corporation C.A. No. 02-909-A (E.D. Va., July 12, 2002) // Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions. Martin H. Samson, 2017. URL: http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case286. cfm (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Protection of Trade Marks: Online Use and Anticybersquatting. P. 54 // CMS А Legal, 2017. URL: http://www.cms-cmck.com/Hubbard.FileSystem/files/Publication/edf5b26f- p 1b10-4fed-876c-431e6ab057ab/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/009ddb70-7315-40b5- Б 82dd-6509b526c2c6/cmsantivybersquatting%20brochure.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Protection of Trade Marks: Online Use and Anticybersquatting. P. 54 // CMS А Legal, 2017. URL: http://www.cms-cmck.com/Hubbard.FileSystem/files/Publication/edf5b26f- p 1b10-4fed-876c-431e6ab057ab/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/009ddb70-7315-40b5- Б 82dd-6509b526c2c6/cmsantivybersquatting%20brochure.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trademarks and the Internet (SCT/24/4) 31 Aug 2010. P. 16-22. // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_24/sct_24_4.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trademarks and the Internet (SCT/24/4) 31 Aug 2010. P. 16-22. // WIPO, 2017. URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_24/sct_24_4.pdf (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tiffany Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010) // LexisNexis, 2017. URL: https://www. lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/intellectual-property/b/copyright-trademark-law-blog/ archive/2010/06/30/free-download-opinion-tiffany-inc-v-ebay-inc-600-f-3d-93-2d-cir-n-y-2010.aspx?Redirected=true (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tiffany Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010) // LexisNexis, 2017. URL: https://www. lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/intellectual-property/b/copyright-trademark-law-blog/ archive/2010/06/30/free-download-opinion-tiffany-inc-v-ebay-inc-600-f-3d-93-2d-cir-n-y-2010.aspx?Redirected=true (дата обращения: 20.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 24.02.2009 - I-20 U 204/02 - Art. 98 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit a) und lit b) GMV // dejure.org, 2017. URL: https://dejure.org/dienste/ vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=20%20U%20204/02 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 24.02.2009 - I-20 U 204/02 - Art. 98 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit a) und lit b) GMV // dejure.org, 2017. URL: https://dejure.org/dienste/ vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=20%20U%20204/02 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">eBay Victorious Over Rolex in Latest Counterfeiting Lawsuit // Dulcinea Media, Inc., 2017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">eBay Victorious Over Rolex in Latest Counterfeiting Lawsuit // Dulcinea Media, Inc., 2017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/business/2009/feb/eBay-Victorious-0ver-Rolex-in-Latest-Counterfeiting-Lawsuit.html (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/business/2009/feb/eBay-Victorious-0ver-Rolex-in-Latest-Counterfeiting-Lawsuit.html (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 12 July 2011 // CVRIA, 2017. URL: http:// rn m curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130d5c0748badb694415 b98ceaa36d169edd8.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN40chmKe0?text=&amp;docid=107261&amp;page Index=0&amp;doclang=en&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=1147144 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 12 July 2011 // CVRIA, 2017. URL: http:// rn m curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130d5c0748badb694415 b98ceaa36d169edd8.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN40chmKe0?text=&amp;docid=107261&amp;page Index=0&amp;doclang=en&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=1147144 (дата обращения: 21.03.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дашян М.С. Право информационных магистралей: вопросы правового регулирования в сфере Интернет. - М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2007. - 288 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дашян М.С. Право информационных магистралей: вопросы правового регулирования в сфере Интернет. - М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2007. - 288 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курбалийя Й. Управление Интернетом / Й. Курбалийя; Координационный центр национального домена сети Интернет. - М., 2010. - 208 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Курбалийя Й. Управление Интернетом / Й. Курбалийя; Координационный центр национального домена сети Интернет. - М., 2010. - 208 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Наумов В.Б. Право и Интернет: Очерки теории и практики. - М.: Книжный дом «Университет», 2002. - 432 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Наумов В.Б. Право и Интернет: Очерки теории и практики. - М.: Книжный дом «Университет», 2002. - 432 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Незнамов А.В. Особенности компетенции по рассмотрению интернет-споров: национальный и международный аспекты: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Екатеринбург, 2010. - 26 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Незнамов А.В. Особенности компетенции по рассмотрению интернет-споров: национальный и международный аспекты: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Екатеринбург, 2010. - 26 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
