vestnik-msalВестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))2311-59982782-6163Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)vestnik-msal-1031Research ArticleЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕWhat is Language and Law? And does anyone care?What is Language and Law? And does anyone care?TiersmaP.TiersmaP.20200904202001131148Copyright © Tiersma P., 20202020Tiersma P.Tiersma P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1031
.
.
ReferencesAinsworth, Janet. 1993. In a different register: The pragmatics of powerlessness in police interrogation. Yale Law Journal 103: 259.Ainsworth, Janet. 1993. In a different register: The pragmatics of powerlessness in police interrogation. Yale Law Journal 103: 259.Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The bilingual courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The bilingual courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Bhatia, V. K., Christopher N. Candlin, Jan Engberg, and Anna Trosborg. 2003. Multilingual and multicultural contexts of legislation: An international perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.Bhatia, V. K., Christopher N. Candlin, Jan Engberg, and Anna Trosborg. 2003. Multilingual and multicultural contexts of legislation: An international perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, language, and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, language, and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Bodde, Derk, and Clarence Morris. 1973. Law in imperial China. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Bodde, Derk, and Clarence Morris. 1973. Law in imperial China. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Bowers, Frederick. 1989. Linguistic aspects of legislative expression. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Bowers, Frederick. 1989. Linguistic aspects of legislative expression. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr. 1990. Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr. 1990. Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Corcos, Christine Alice. 2000. An international guide to law and literature. Buffalo, N.Y.: William S. Hein & Co.Corcos, Christine Alice. 2000. An international guide to law and literature. Buffalo, N.Y.: William S. Hein & Co.Cotterill, Janet. 2003. Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Houndmills: Palgrave.Cotterill, Janet. 2003. Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Houndmills: Palgrave.Coulthard, Malcolm. 2002. Whose voice is it?: Invented and concealed dialogue in written records of verbal evidence produced by the police. Language in the legal process 19 (Janet Cotterill ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave.Coulthard, Malcolm. 2002. Whose voice is it?: Invented and concealed dialogue in written records of verbal evidence produced by the police. Language in the legal process 19 (Janet Cotterill ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave.Eades, Diana. 2005. Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics 26:503—526.Eades, Diana. 2005. Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics 26:503—526.Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent.Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent.What is language and law? And does anyone care? 35 London: Routledge.What is language and law? And does anyone care? 35 London: Routledge.Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham: Duke University Press.Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham: Duke University Press.Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: Macmillan.Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: Macmillan.Greenawalt, Kent. 1989. Speech, crime, and the uses of language. Oxford: University Press.Greenawalt, Kent. 1989. Speech, crime, and the uses of language. Oxford: University Press.Grice, H. P. 1989. Logic and conversation. Studies in the way of words, 22- 40. Harvard: University Press.Grice, H. P. 1989. Logic and conversation. Studies in the way of words, 22- 40. Harvard: University Press.Haiman, Franklyn S. 1993. “Speech acts” and the First Amendment. Chicago: University Press.Haiman, Franklyn S. 1993. “Speech acts” and the First Amendment. Chicago: University Press.Jackson, Bernard S. 1985. Semiotics and legal theory. London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.Jackson, Bernard S. 1985. Semiotics and legal theory. London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is hereby performed: Legal speech acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is hereby performed: Legal speech acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Levi, Judith. 1994. Language and the law: A bibliographic guide to social science research in the U.S. A. Chicago: American Bar Association.Levi, Judith. 1994. Language and the law: A bibliographic guide to social science research in the U.S. A. Chicago: American Bar Association.Matoesian, Gregory. 2001. Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: University Press.Matoesian, Gregory. 2001. Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: University Press.Megarry, R. E. 1958. Miscellany-at-law: A diversion for lawyers and others. London: Stevens and Sons.Megarry, R. E. 1958. Miscellany-at-law: A diversion for lawyers and others. London: Stevens and Sons.Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The language of the law. London: Little, Brown & Co.Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The language of the law. London: Little, Brown & Co.Miller, Geoffrey P. 1990. Pragmatics and the maxims of interpretation. Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1179.Miller, Geoffrey P. 1990. Pragmatics and the maxims of interpretation. Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1179.Plato. 1926. Plato in twelve volumes, XI, Laws, vol. 2 (R. G. Bury trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Plato. 1926. Plato in twelve volumes, XI, Laws, vol. 2 (R. G. Bury trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Posner, Richard. 1988. Law and literature: A misunderstood relation. Harvard: University Press.Posner, Richard. 1988. Law and literature: A misunderstood relation. Harvard: University Press.Quinn, Susan. 2000. From orality to literacy in medieval Iceland. Old Icelandic literature and society 30 (Margaret Clunies Ross ed.). Cambridge: University Press.Quinn, Susan. 2000. From orality to literacy in medieval Iceland. Old Icelandic literature and society 30 (Margaret Clunies Ross ed.). Cambridge: University Press.Sarat, Austin, and Thomas B. Kearns (eds.). 1994. The rhetoric of law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Sarat, Austin, and Thomas B. Kearns (eds.). 1994. The rhetoric of law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Shuy, Roger. 1993. Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell.Shuy, Roger. 1993. Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell.Sinclair, M. B. W. 1985. Law and language: The role of pragmatics in statutory interpretation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46: 373.Sinclair, M. B. W. 1985. Law and language: The role of pragmatics in statutory interpretation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46: 373.Solan, Lawrence M. 1993. The language of judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Solan, Lawrence M. 1993. The language of judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Solan, Lawrence M. 1998. Law, language, and lenity. William & Mary Law Review 40:57.Solan, Lawrence M. 1998. Law, language, and lenity. William & Mary Law Review 40:57.Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter Tiersma. 2005. Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University Press.Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter Tiersma. 2005. Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University Press.Stygall, Gail. 1994. Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Stygall, Gail. 1994. Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Texas Law Abstract. 1982. Symposium: Law and literature. University of Texas Law Review 60: 373—586.Texas Law Abstract. 1982. Symposium: Law and literature. University of Texas Law Review 60: 373—586.Tiersma, Peter. 1993. Nonverbal communication and the freedom of “speech.” Wisconsin Law Review 1993: 1525—1589.Tiersma, Peter. 1993. Nonverbal communication and the freedom of “speech.” Wisconsin Law Review 1993: 1525—1589.Tiersma, Peter. 1999. Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Tiersma, Peter. 1999. Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Tiersma, Peter. 2005. The new Black’s. Journal of Legal Education 55:386.Tiersma, Peter. 2005. The new Black’s. Journal of Legal Education 55:386.Tiersma, Peter. 2006. Toward more understandable jury instructions. Criminal Justice 21:4.Tiersma, Peter. 2006. Toward more understandable jury instructions. Criminal Justice 21:4.What is language and law? And does anyone care? 37.What is language and law? And does anyone care? 37.VerSteeg, Russ. 2000. Early Mesopotamian law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.VerSteeg, Russ. 2000. Early Mesopotamian law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Winter, Steven L. A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Winter, Steven L. A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Wydick, Richard. 1994. Plain English for lawyers (third edition). Durham : Carolina Academic Press.Wydick, Richard. 1994. Plain English for lawyers (third edition). Durham : Carolina Academic Press.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.